Logourl black
From our private database of 14,200+ case briefs...

Arthur Andersen LLP v. United States

United States Supreme Court
544 U.S. 696 (2005)


Facts

Arthur Andersen LLP (Andersen) (defendant) was Enron’s accountant during Enron’s financial record manipulation scandal in 2002. When the Securities and Exchange Commission opened an informal investigation of Enron, Andersen began telling its employees as well as Enron employees to strictly adhere to the company’s document retention policy, meaning that if any Enron-related documents were eligible to be destroyed under the policy, they should be so destroyed immediately. Andersen informed its employees of this directive multiple times and it resulted in the “substantial destruction of paper and electronic documents” that were then not available to the government in Enron’s subsequent litigation. Andersen was charged with obstruction of justice under 18 U.S.C. § 1512(b) in that it knowingly and corruptly persuaded others to withhold documents from an official proceeding. The United States District Court for the Southern District of Texas issued jury instructions which included directing the jury to find Andersen guilty even if Andersen honestly and sincerely believed that its conduct was lawful. The jury was also instructed to find Andersen guilty if it found that Andersen intended to impede governmental fact finding by telling employees to adhere to the document retention policy. The jury convicted Andersen and the United States Court of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit affirmed. The United States Supreme Court granted certiorari to review the proper meaning of the obstruction of justice statute.

Rule of Law

Issue

Holding and Reasoning (Rehnquist, C.J.)

What to do next…

  1. Unlock this case brief with a free (no-commitment) trial membership of Quimbee.

    You’ll be in good company: Quimbee is one of the most widely used and trusted sites for law students, serving more than 97,000 law students since 2011. Some law schools—such as Yale, Vanderbilt, Berkeley, and the University of Illinois—even subscribe directly to Quimbee for all their law students. Read our student testimonials.

  2. Learn more about Quimbee’s unique (and proven) approach to achieving great grades at law school.

    Quimbee is a company hell-bent on one thing: helping you get an “A” in every course you take in law school, so you can graduate at the top of your class and get a high-paying law job. We’re not just a study aid for law students; we’re the study aid for law students. Read more about Quimbee.

Here's why 251,000 law students have relied on our case briefs:

  • Written by law professors and practitioners, not other law students. 14,200 briefs, keyed to 189 casebooks. Top-notch customer support.
  • The right amount of information, includes the facts, issues, rule of law, holding and reasoning, and any concurrences and dissents.
  • Access in your classes, works on your mobile and tablet. Massive library of related video lessons and high quality multiple-choice questions.
  • Easy to use, uniform format for every case brief. Written in plain English, not in legalese. Our briefs summarize and simplify; they don’t just repeat the court’s language.