Arthur Perkins v. Lake County Department of Utilities
United States District Court for the Northern District of Ohio
860 F. Supp. 1262 (1994)
- Written by Jamie Milne, JD
Facts
Arthur Perkins (plaintiff) worked for the Lake County Department of Utilities (department) (defendant). Perkins sued the department in federal court, alleging that the department violated Title VII of the Civil Rights Act of 1964 by discriminating against Perkins in the workplace based on Perkins’s status as an American Indian. Specifically, Perkins alleged that he was subjected to derogatory racial comments, not permitted to work overtime, and denied promotions for which he was qualified. The department moved for summary judgment, arguing in part that Perkins was not an American Indian and consequently could not claim protection under Title VII. The department presented evidence that Perkins’s family ancestry, as traced through government records, showed that he was White, not American Indian. Additionally, neither Perkins nor his close family members were enrolled as members of the Cherokee Nation, the tribe with which Perkins claimed affiliation. However, Perkins submitted affidavits from family members affirming that the Perkins family claimed American Indian heritage. He also presented evidence from a social worker from the North American Indian Cultural Center, who stated that Perkins’s facial structure and complexion supported that he was an American Indian. Also, it was undisputed that regardless of Perkins’s ancestry, he represented himself as an American Indian throughout his employment with the department and that, until the suit was filed, the department treated that representation as accurate. The court considered the evidence to determine whether to grant the department’s motion for summary judgment.
Rule of Law
Issue
Holding and Reasoning (Perelman, J.)
What to do next…
Here's why 832,000 law students have relied on our case briefs:
- Written by law professors and practitioners, not other law students. 46,400 briefs, keyed to 994 casebooks. Top-notch customer support.
- The right amount of information, includes the facts, issues, rule of law, holding and reasoning, and any concurrences and dissents.
- Access in your classes, works on your mobile and tablet. Massive library of related video lessons and high quality multiple-choice questions.
- Easy to use, uniform format for every case brief. Written in plain English, not in legalese. Our briefs summarize and simplify; they don’t just repeat the court’s language.