Quimbee logo
DMCA.com Protection Status

Arthur v. Arthur

720 N.E.2d 176 (1998)

Case BriefRelatedOptions
From our private database of 34,000+ case briefs...

Arthur v. Arthur

Ohio Court of Appeals

720 N.E.2d 176 (1998)

Play video

Facts

Cindy Arthur (plaintiff) and Michael Arthur (defendant) were married with four children—two boys and two girls. The family was very involved in the World Harvest Church. The church was a focal point in the Arthurs’ lives, including their friendships and activities. Michael worked for the church, and the children went to school at the World Harvest Christian Academy (the Academy). The children’s contacts and activities outside of the church were minimal. Subsequently, Michael left his job with the church and began to disassociate from the church. Cindy filed a petition for divorce in the Domestic Relations Division of the Fairfield County Court of Common Pleas. Evidence at trial indicated that the Academy had staffing issues, teachers who did not have relevant experience, and an inadequate curriculum. The Arthurs’ boys expressed a keen interest in sports and other activities that the church and the Academy did not offer. Michael involved the boys in sports and other activities outside of the church during the boys’ visits. The trial court granted Cindy a divorce, awarded Cindy primary physical custody of the two girls, and awarded Michael primary physical custody of the two boys. The trial court instituted a generous visitation schedule for each parent, so that all four children would be together for 185 full days and 72 partial days during the year. Cindy appealed, arguing that the trial court improperly gave custody of the boys to Michael due to Cindy’s religion.

Rule of Law

Issue

Holding and Reasoning (Hoffman, J.)

What to do next…

  1. Unlock this case brief with a free (no-commitment) trial membership of Quimbee.

    You’ll be in good company: Quimbee is one of the most widely used and trusted sites for law students, serving more than 607,000 law students since 2011. Some law schools—such as Yale, Berkeley, and Northwestern—even subscribe directly to Quimbee for all their law students.

    Unlock this case briefRead our student testimonials
  2. Learn more about Quimbee’s unique (and proven) approach to achieving great grades at law school.

    Quimbee is a company hell-bent on one thing: helping you get an “A” in every course you take in law school, so you can graduate at the top of your class and get a high-paying law job. We’re not just a study aid for law students; we’re the study aid for law students.

    Learn about our approachRead more about Quimbee

Here's why 607,000 law students have relied on our case briefs:

  • Written by law professors and practitioners, not other law students. 34,000 briefs, keyed to 984 casebooks. Top-notch customer support.
  • The right amount of information, includes the facts, issues, rule of law, holding and reasoning, and any concurrences and dissents.
  • Access in your classes, works on your mobile and tablet. Massive library of related video lessons and high quality multiple-choice questions.
  • Easy to use, uniform format for every case brief. Written in plain English, not in legalese. Our briefs summarize and simplify; they don’t just repeat the court’s language.

Access this case brief for FREE

With a 7-day free trial membership
Here's why 607,000 law students have relied on our case briefs:
  • Reliable - written by law professors and practitioners, not other law students
  • The right length and amount of information - includes the facts, issue, rule of law, holding and reasoning, and any concurrences and dissents
  • Access in your class - works on your mobile and tablet
  • 34,000 briefs - keyed to 984 casebooks
  • Uniform format for every case brief
  • Written in plain English - not in legalese and not just repeating the court's language
  • Massive library of related video lessons - and practice questions
  • Top-notch customer support

Access this case brief for FREE

With a 7-day free trial membership