Logourl black
From our private database of 14,100+ case briefs...

Asahi Kasei Pharma Corp. v. Actelion Ltd.

California Court of Appeal
222 Cal. App. 4th 945 (2014)


Facts

Asahi Kasei Pharma Corporation (Asahi) (plaintiff) signed a licensing contract with CoTherix, Inc. (CoTherix). The contract provided that CoTherix would assist Asahi with developing and marketing Asahi’s drug to treat pulmonary arterial hypertension (PAH). Actelion Limited (Actelion) (defendant) marketed a competing PAH drug. Actelion acquired CoTherix and informed Asahi that it would be discontinuing the development of Asahi’s drug. Asahi brought suit against Actelion and three Actelion executives for intentional interference with contractual relations. Asahi presented evidence that Actelion acquired CoTherix solely because it saw Asahi’s drug as a threat to Actelion’s market dominance. The trial court found in favor of Asahi and awarded Asahi almost $550 million in compensatory damages and $30 million in punitive damages. Actelion appealed, arguing that as of its acquisition of CoTherix it was no longer a disinterested third party to the Asahi-CoTherix contract. As a result, Actelion argued, it could not be liable for contractual interference as of that date.

Rule of Law

The rule of law is the black letter law upon which the court rested its decision.

To access this section, please start your free trial or log in.

Issue

The issue section includes the dispositive legal issue in the case phrased as a question.

To access this section, please start your free trial or log in.

Holding and Reasoning (Bruiniers, J.)

The holding and reasoning section includes:

  • A "yes" or "no" answer to the question framed in the issue section;
  • A summary of the majority or plurality opinion, using the CREAC method; and
  • The procedural disposition (e.g. reversed and remanded, affirmed, etc.).

To access this section, please start your free trial or log in.

What to do next…

  1. Unlock this case brief with a free (no-commitment) trial membership of Quimbee.

    You’ll be in good company: Quimbee is one of the most widely used and trusted sites for law students, serving more than 97,000 law students since 2011. Some law schools—such as Yale, Vanderbilt, Berkeley, and the University of Illinois—even subscribe directly to Quimbee for all their law students. Read our student testimonials.

  2. Learn more about Quimbee’s unique (and proven) approach to achieving great grades at law school.

    Quimbee is a company hell-bent on one thing: helping you get an “A” in every course you take in law school, so you can graduate at the top of your class and get a high-paying law job. We’re not just a study aid for law students; we’re the study aid for law students. Read more about Quimbee.

Here's why 222,000 law students have relied on our case briefs:

  • Written by law professors and practitioners, not other law students. 14,100 briefs, keyed to 189 casebooks. Top-notch customer support.
  • The right amount of information, includes the facts, issues, rule of law, holding and reasoning, and any concurrences and dissents.
  • Access in your classes, works on your mobile and tablet. Massive library of related video lessons and high quality multiple-choice questions.
  • Easy to use, uniform format for every case brief. Written in plain English, not in legalese. Our briefs summarize and simplify; they don’t just repeat the court’s language.