Asbury v. Brougham
United States Court of Appeals for the Tenth Circuit
866 F.2d 1276 (1989)
- Written by Sean Carroll, JD
Facts
Asbury (plaintiff), a Black woman, went to Brougham Estates (Brougham) (defendant) with her daughter seeking to rent housing. There were already a number of minority residents at Brougham. Based on her salary, Asbury was qualified to rent from Brougham. The manager on duty told Asbury that there were no vacancies and that she should try to rent from a different complex. However, substantial evidence showed that there were in fact units available for rent at the time. Asbury brought suit under 42 U.S.C. § 1982 and the Fair Housing Act, claiming discrimination. Brougham claimed that there were Brougham policies that precluded it from renting apartments to families with children. The trial court awarded Asbury compensatory and punitive damages. Brougham moved for a new trial.
Rule of Law
Issue
Holding and Reasoning (Parker, J.)
What to do next…
Here's why 899,000 law students have relied on our case briefs:
- Written by law professors and practitioners, not other law students. 47,000 briefs, keyed to 994 casebooks. Top-notch customer support.
- The right amount of information, includes the facts, issues, rule of law, holding and reasoning, and any concurrences and dissents.
- Access in your classes, works on your mobile and tablet. Massive library of related video lessons and high quality multiple-choice questions.
- Easy to use, uniform format for every case brief. Written in plain English, not in legalese. Our briefs summarize and simplify; they don’t just repeat the court’s language.
