Ash Park, LLC v. Alexander & Bishop, Ltd.
Wisconsin Supreme Court
783 N.W.2d 294, 324 Wis. 2d 703 (2010)
- Written by Angela Patrick, JD
Facts
Alexander & Bishop, Ltd. (Alexander) (defendant) contracted to purchase land from Ash Park, LLC (plaintiff) to develop into a shopping mall. The contract contained a clause allowing either party to sue for specific performance if the other party breached. Alexander lost its anchor tenant for the mall and decided not to go through with the sale. Ash Park sued for an order forcing Alexander to buy the land. The trial court found that Alexander had breached the contract. Without finding that legal damages would be inadequate, the trial court awarded specific performance and ordered Alexander to purchase the land. The appellate court affirmed. In the Wisconsin Supreme Court, Alexander argued that either (1) Wisconsin law required a finding that legal damages were inadequate before a court could order specific performance of any contract or else (2) Wisconsin law should be changed to include this requirement. For the first time, Alexander also argued that it would be impossible to get financing to buy the land without an anchor tenant.
Rule of Law
Issue
Holding and Reasoning (Bradley, J.)
What to do next…
Here's why 805,000 law students have relied on our case briefs:
- Written by law professors and practitioners, not other law students. 46,300 briefs, keyed to 988 casebooks. Top-notch customer support.
- The right amount of information, includes the facts, issues, rule of law, holding and reasoning, and any concurrences and dissents.
- Access in your classes, works on your mobile and tablet. Massive library of related video lessons and high quality multiple-choice questions.
- Easy to use, uniform format for every case brief. Written in plain English, not in legalese. Our briefs summarize and simplify; they don’t just repeat the court’s language.