Ashcroft v. al-Kidd
United States Supreme Court
131 S. Ct 2074 (2011)
Federal statute 18 U.S.C. § 3144 authorizes a magistrate to issue a warrant to arrest someone as a material witness based on an affidavit showing that the testimony of the person is material in a criminal proceeding and that it would be impracticable to use a subpoena to secure his presence. In 2003, Abdullah al-Kidd (plaintiff), an American citizen, was at the airport on his way to study in Saudi Arabia on scholarship when he was arrested pursuant to a material-witness warrant (MWW). The warrant had been issued based on an affidavit from the Federal Bureau of Investigation (FBI), asserting that al-Kidd was suspected of having information linked to the prosecution of Sami Omar Al-Hussayen for various fraud-related charges. Al-Kidd was handcuffed, interrogated, and detained for over two weeks, during which time he claims he was treated harshly. Al-Kidd was never called as a witness, and there was no evidence he committed any crime himself. Al-Kidd brought suit against Attorney General Ashcroft and others (defendants) for injuries resulting from the claimed misuse of material-witness detention and the conditions of his confinement. The defendants moved to dismiss the case, claiming qualified immunity, and the district court denied the motion. The defendants then appealed, and the United States Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit affirmed. A rehearing en banc was denied, and the defendants petitioned for certiorari. The Supreme Court granted their petition.
Rule of Law
Holding and Reasoning (Scalia, J.)
Concurrence (Sotomayor, J.)
Concurrence (Ginsburg, J.)
Concurrence (Kennedy, J.)
What to do next…
Unlock this case brief with a free (no-commitment) trial membership of Quimbee.
You’ll be in good company: Quimbee is one of the most widely used and trusted sites for law students, serving more than 97,000 law students since 2011. Some law schools—such as Yale, Vanderbilt, Berkeley, and the University of Illinois—even subscribe directly to Quimbee for all their law students. Read our student testimonials.
Learn more about Quimbee’s unique (and proven) approach to achieving great grades at law school.
Quimbee is a company hell-bent on one thing: helping you get an “A” in every course you take in law school, so you can graduate at the top of your class and get a high-paying law job. We’re not just a study aid for law students; we’re the study aid for law students. Read more about Quimbee.
Here's why 178,000 law students have relied on our case briefs:
- Written by law professors and practitioners, not other law students. 14,000 briefs, keyed to 188 casebooks. Top-notch customer support.
- The right amount of information, includes the facts, issues, rule of law, holding and reasoning, and any concurrences and dissents.
- Access in your classes, works on your mobile and tablet. Massive library of related video lessons and high quality multiple-choice questions.
- Easy to use, uniform format for every case brief. Written in plain English, not in legalese. Our briefs summarize and simplify; they don’t just repeat the court’s language.