From our private database of 37,200+ case briefs...
Ashe v. Swenson
United States Supreme Court
397 U.S. 436 (1970)
Bob Ashe (defendant) was charged under state law with six separate offenses for robbing six men during a poker game. At his trial for robbing one of the men, Knight, the jury found Ashe not guilty due to insufficient evidence. However, there was no dispute that a robbery had occurred and that Knight was a victim of the robbery. Six weeks later, Ashe was on trial again for the robbery of another poker player. Citing his prior acquittal, Ashe filed a motion to dismiss. The motion was overruled. At the second trial, the prosecution was able to adjust its case based on the weaknesses that emerged in the first trial. For example, the state’s witnesses were more certain of their eyewitness identifications, testifying to the sound of Ashe’s voice and his mannerisms. Also, one witness who had failed to give a convincing identification was not called to testify. Ashe was convicted by a jury, and the Missouri Supreme Court affirmed the conviction. Ashe filed a habeas corpus petition in federal court, asserting that his second trial violated the Double Jeopardy Clause. The district court denied Ashe's petition, and the appellate court affirmed. The United States Supreme Court granted certiorari.
Rule of Law
Holding and Reasoning (Stewart, J.)
Dissent (Burger, C.J.)
What to do next…
Unlock this case brief with a free (no-commitment) trial membership of Quimbee.
You’ll be in good company: Quimbee is one of the most widely used and trusted sites for law students, serving more than 630,000 law students since 2011. Some law schools—such as Yale, Berkeley, and Northwestern—even subscribe directly to Quimbee for all their law students.Unlock this case briefRead our student testimonials
Learn more about Quimbee’s unique (and proven) approach to achieving great grades at law school.
Quimbee is a company hell-bent on one thing: helping you get an “A” in every course you take in law school, so you can graduate at the top of your class and get a high-paying law job. We’re not just a study aid for law students; we’re the study aid for law students.Learn about our approachRead more about Quimbee
Here's why 630,000 law students have relied on our case briefs:
- Written by law professors and practitioners, not other law students. 37,200 briefs, keyed to 984 casebooks. Top-notch customer support.
- The right amount of information, includes the facts, issues, rule of law, holding and reasoning, and any concurrences and dissents.
- Access in your classes, works on your mobile and tablet. Massive library of related video lessons and high quality multiple-choice questions.
- Easy to use, uniform format for every case brief. Written in plain English, not in legalese. Our briefs summarize and simplify; they don’t just repeat the court’s language.