Aspen Highlands Skiing Corp. v. Apostolou

866 P.2d 1384 (1994)

From our private database of 46,300+ case briefs, written and edited by humans—never with AI.

Aspen Highlands Skiing Corp. v. Apostolou

Colorado Supreme Court
866 P.2d 1384 (1994)

Facts

John Apostolou (plaintiff) worked for Aspen Highlands Skiing Corporation (Highlands) (defendant) as a part-time ski instructor. In January of 1990, Highlands sought ski instructors with cardiopulmonary resuscitation (CPR) qualifications for Highlands’ ski patrol. Part-time ski-patrol members were not paid wages, but they each received a ski-free identification card from Highlands. As an instructor, Apostolou already had a ski-free card, so he negotiated to receive unlimited daily ski passes for his girlfriend. Apostolou would not have agreed to join the ski patrol if Highlands had not agreed to give him the passes. In February of 1990, Apostolou injured his knee while on ski-patrol duty and could not continue working as an instructor or ski-patrol member. Apostolou sought workers’-compensation benefits, but Highlands contested Apostolou’s claim, noting that Colorado’s legislature had recently amended the state workers’-compensation statute to exclude volunteer ski-patrol members from the statutory definition of employees entitled to benefits. Highlands argued that Apostolou was a volunteer and not an employee at the time of his injury because Apostolou was not paid wages for his ski-patrol work. An administrative-law judge (ALJ) concluded that Apostolou was an employee and awarded benefits, and an industrial claim appeals panel and the Colorado Court of Appeals affirmed. Highlands appealed to the Colorado Supreme Court.

Rule of Law

Issue

Holding and Reasoning (Lohr, J.)

Dissent (Vollack, J.)

What to do next…

  1. Unlock this case brief with a free (no-commitment) trial membership of Quimbee.

    You’ll be in good company: Quimbee is one of the most widely used and trusted sites for law students, serving more than 804,000 law students since 2011. Some law schools—such as Yale, Berkeley, and Northwestern—even subscribe directly to Quimbee for all their law students.

    Unlock this case briefRead our student testimonials
  2. Learn more about Quimbee’s unique (and proven) approach to achieving great grades at law school.

    Quimbee is a company hell-bent on one thing: helping you get an “A” in every course you take in law school, so you can graduate at the top of your class and get a high-paying law job. We’re not just a study aid for law students; we’re the study aid for law students.

    Learn about our approachRead more about Quimbee

Here's why 804,000 law students have relied on our case briefs:

  • Written by law professors and practitioners, not other law students. 46,300 briefs, keyed to 988 casebooks. Top-notch customer support.
  • The right amount of information, includes the facts, issues, rule of law, holding and reasoning, and any concurrences and dissents.
  • Access in your classes, works on your mobile and tablet. Massive library of related video lessons and high quality multiple-choice questions.
  • Easy to use, uniform format for every case brief. Written in plain English, not in legalese. Our briefs summarize and simplify; they don’t just repeat the court’s language.

Access this case brief for FREE

With a 7-day free trial membership
Here's why 804,000 law students have relied on our case briefs:
  • Reliable - written by law professors and practitioners, not other law students
  • The right length and amount of information - includes the facts, issue, rule of law, holding and reasoning, and any concurrences and dissents
  • Access in your class - works on your mobile and tablet
  • 46,300 briefs - keyed to 988 casebooks
  • Uniform format for every case brief
  • Written in plain English - not in legalese and not just repeating the court's language
  • Massive library of related video lessons - and practice questions
  • Top-notch customer support

Access this case brief for FREE

With a 7-day free trial membership