Logourl black
From our private database of 14,100+ case briefs...

Associated General Contractors of California, Inc. v. California State Council of Carpenters

United States Supreme Court
459 U.S. 519 (1983)


Facts

Associated General Contractors of California, Inc. (General Contractors) (defendant) was a membership corporation composed of various building and construction contractors. The California State Council of Carpenters (the union) (plaintiff) was one of several California unions composed of individuals working in the construction business. Collectively, the California unions represented over 50,000 people. The union and General Contractors negotiated and entered into collective-bargaining agreements covering the union’s workers for over 25 years. The union claimed that General Contractors acted to undermine the union’s collective­-bargaining position by coercing third-party contractors not to enter into collective-bargaining agreements with the union and also by coercing contractors and subcontractors to hire nonunion workers. Seeking a remedy, the union brought a lawsuit against General Contractors, claiming that General Contractors’s coercive conduct amounted to an antitrust violation, entitling the union to treble damages under § 4 of the Clayton Act. General Contractors brought a motion to dismiss the union’s claim for treble damages, but the court of appeals allowed the claim to proceed. General Contractors appealed the decision.

Rule of Law

The rule of law is the black letter law upon which the court rested its decision.

To access this section, please start your free trial or log in.

Issue

The issue section includes the dispositive legal issue in the case phrased as a question.

To access this section, please start your free trial or log in.

Holding and Reasoning (Stevens, J.)

The holding and reasoning section includes:

  • A "yes" or "no" answer to the question framed in the issue section;
  • A summary of the majority or plurality opinion, using the CREAC method; and
  • The procedural disposition (e.g. reversed and remanded, affirmed, etc.).

To access this section, please start your free trial or log in.

What to do next…

  1. Unlock this case brief with a free (no-commitment) trial membership of Quimbee.

    You’ll be in good company: Quimbee is one of the most widely used and trusted sites for law students, serving more than 97,000 law students since 2011. Some law schools—such as Yale, Vanderbilt, Berkeley, and the University of Illinois—even subscribe directly to Quimbee for all their law students. Read our student testimonials.

  2. Learn more about Quimbee’s unique (and proven) approach to achieving great grades at law school.

    Quimbee is a company hell-bent on one thing: helping you get an “A” in every course you take in law school, so you can graduate at the top of your class and get a high-paying law job. We’re not just a study aid for law students; we’re the study aid for law students. Read more about Quimbee.

Here's why 221,000 law students have relied on our case briefs:

  • Written by law professors and practitioners, not other law students. 14,100 briefs, keyed to 189 casebooks. Top-notch customer support.
  • The right amount of information, includes the facts, issues, rule of law, holding and reasoning, and any concurrences and dissents.
  • Access in your classes, works on your mobile and tablet. Massive library of related video lessons and high quality multiple-choice questions.
  • Easy to use, uniform format for every case brief. Written in plain English, not in legalese. Our briefs summarize and simplify; they don’t just repeat the court’s language.