Associated Press v. United States
United States Supreme Court
326 U.S. 1 (1945)
The Associated Press (AP) (defendant) was a membership corporation made up of publishers that were responsible for over 1,200 newspapers. The purpose of AP was to collect, assemble, and distribute news to its members. The members of AP agreed to follow a set of bylaws that prohibited all AP members from selling news to non-members and also authorized members to block non-members from obtaining AP membership. The federal government (plaintiff) believed that AP’s bylaws amounted to an unlawful restraint of trade in violation of the Sherman Act and brought a legal suit against AP for antitrust violations. The district court found that AP’s bylaws were intended to restrain trade and created a competitive disadvantage that impeded the growth of non-member newspapers. AP appealed the decision.
Rule of Law
Holding and Reasoning (Black, J.)
What to do next…
Unlock this case brief with a free (no-commitment) trial membership of Quimbee.
You’ll be in good company: Quimbee is one of the most widely used and trusted sites for law students, serving more than 97,000 law students since 2011. Some law schools—such as Yale, Vanderbilt, Berkeley, and the University of Illinois—even subscribe directly to Quimbee for all their law students. Read our student testimonials.
Learn more about Quimbee’s unique (and proven) approach to achieving great grades at law school.
Quimbee is a company hell-bent on one thing: helping you get an “A” in every course you take in law school, so you can graduate at the top of your class and get a high-paying law job. We’re not just a study aid for law students; we’re the study aid for law students. Read more about Quimbee.
Here's why 174,000 law students have relied on our case briefs:
- Written by law professors and practitioners, not other law students. 14,000 briefs, keyed to 188 casebooks. Top-notch customer support.
- The right amount of information, includes the facts, issues, rule of law, holding and reasoning, and any concurrences and dissents.
- Access in your classes, works on your mobile and tablet. Massive library of related video lessons and high quality multiple-choice questions.
- Easy to use, uniform format for every case brief. Written in plain English, not in legalese. Our briefs summarize and simplify; they don’t just repeat the court’s language.