Association of Data Processing Service Organizations, Inc. v. Board of Governors of the Federal Reserve System
United States Court of Appeals for the District of Columbia Circuit
745 F. 2d 677 (1984)

- Written by Eric Cervone, LLM
Facts
Citicorp, a bank, petitioned the Board of Governors of the Federal Reserve System (Board) (defendant) for approval to establish a data-processing subsidiary. The Board conducted a formal hearing on Citicorp's petition. The administrative law judge, sometimes called an ALJ, who presided over the hearing made findings of fact. Based on these factual findings, the administrative law judge recommended that the Board approve Citicorp's petition and, as a related action, amend a Board regulation. The Board: (1) adopted the administrative law judge’s factual findings, (2) approved Citicorp's petition, which was an adjudicatory action, and (3) followed the Administrative Procedure Act’s (APA’s), 5 U.S.C. § 551 et seq., procedure to amend the Board regulation, which was a regulatory action. The Association of Data Processing Service Organizations, Inc. (ADPSO), a data-processing industry group, petitioned the Board for a review of both the adjudicatory action and the regulatory action. The ADPSO contended that the Board was statutorily required to demonstrate substantial evidence in support of both actions, and failed to do so.
Rule of Law
Issue
Holding and Reasoning (Scalia, J.)
What to do next…
Here's why 899,000 law students have relied on our case briefs:
- Written by law professors and practitioners, not other law students. 47,000 briefs, keyed to 994 casebooks. Top-notch customer support.
- The right amount of information, includes the facts, issues, rule of law, holding and reasoning, and any concurrences and dissents.
- Access in your classes, works on your mobile and tablet. Massive library of related video lessons and high quality multiple-choice questions.
- Easy to use, uniform format for every case brief. Written in plain English, not in legalese. Our briefs summarize and simplify; they don’t just repeat the court’s language.


