Logourl black
From our private database of 13,300+ case briefs...

AT&T Corp. v. Iowa Utilities Board

United States Supreme Court
525 U.S. 366 (1999)


Facts

Until the 1990s, natural monopolies controlled local phone services due to technological limitations. States typically granted an exclusive franchise in each local service area to a local exchange carrier (LEC). Since the 1990s, technological innovations have made competition among multiple carriers possible. The Telecommunications Act of 1996 (the Act) restructured local communications by providing, among other things, that the LEC must share its network with competitors. After the passage of the  Act, the FCC issued its First Report and Order implementing the local-competition provisions. Rule 319, the primary unbundling rule, sets forth the minimum number of network elements that incumbents must make available to requesting carriers. In bringing suit, the LECs and state commissions argued that Section 201(b) of the Act, which provides that “the Commission may prescribe such rules and regulations as may be necessary in the public interest to carry out the provisions of this Act,” limited rulemaking authority to provisions dealing with purely interstate and foreign matters. They argue so because the first sentence of Section 201(a) stated that “it is the first duty of every common carrier engaged in interstate or foreign communication by wire or radio to furnish such communication service upon reasonable request therefor.”

Rule of Law

The rule of law is the black letter law upon which the court rested its decision. To access this section, start your 7-day free trial of Quimbee for Law Students.

Issue

The issue section includes the dispositive legal issue in the case phrased as a question. To access this section, start your 7-day free trial of Quimbee for Law Students.

Holding and Reasoning (Scalia, J.)

The holding and reasoning section includes:

  • A “yes” or “no” answer to the question framed in the issue section;
  • A summary of the majority or plurality opinion, using the CREAC method; and
  • The procedural disposition (e.g. reversed and remanded, affirmed, etc.).

To access this section, start your 7-day free trial of Quimbee for Law Students.

What to do next…

  1. Unlock this case brief with a free (no-commitment) trial membership of Quimbee.

    You’ll be in good company: Quimbee is one of the most widely used and trusted sites for law students, serving more than 97,000 law students since 2011. Some law schools—such as Yale, Vanderbilt, Berkeley, and the University of Illinois—even subscribe directly to Quimbee for all their law students. Read our student testimonials.

  2. Learn more about Quimbee’s unique (and proven) approach to achieving great grades at law school.

    Quimbee is a company hell-bent on one thing: helping you get an “A” in every course you take in law school, so you can graduate at the top of your class and get a high-paying law job. We’re not just a study aid for law students; we’re the study aid for law students. Read more about Quimbee.

Here's why 136,000 law students have relied on our case briefs:

  • Written by law professors and practitioners, not other law students. 13,300 briefs, keyed to 182 casebooks. Top-notch customer support.
  • The right amount of information, includes the facts, issues, rule of law, holding and reasoning, and any concurrences and dissents.
  • Access in your classes, works on your mobile and tablet. Massive library of related video lessons and high quality multiple-choice questions.
  • Easy to use, uniform format for every case brief. Written in plain English, not in legalese. Our briefs summarize and simplify; they don’t just repeat the court’s language.