From our private database of 35,400+ case briefs...
AT&T Corp. v. Iowa Utilities Board
United States Supreme Court
525 U.S. 366 (1999)
Until the 1990s, natural monopolies controlled local phone services due to technological limitations. States typically granted an exclusive franchise in each local service area to a local exchange carrier (LEC). The Telecommunications Act of 1996 restructured local communications by providing that the LEC must share its network with competitors, including long-distance phone service providers. After the passage of the act, the Federal Communications Commission (FCC) implemented the local-competition provisions. Rule 319, the primary unbundling rule, set forth the minimum number of network elements that LECs must make available to requesting providers. A group of LECs and state commissions (plaintiffs) brought suit against AT&T, other long-distance phone service providers, and the FCC (defendants). The plaintiffs argued that Section 201(b) of the act, which allowed the FCC to prescribe rules and regulations that were necessary to carry out the provisions of the act, limited rulemaking authority to provisions dealing with purely interstate and foreign matters. The LECs and state commissions reasoned that the first sentence of Section 201(a) stated that it was common carriers' duty to provide communication services upon request. The United States Court of Appeals for the Eighth Circuit consolidated a number of similar challenges and ruled in favor of the plaintiffs. The United States Supreme Court granted certiorari.
Rule of Law
Holding and Reasoning (Scalia, J.)
Concurrence/Dissent (Breyer, J. )
Concurrence/Dissent (Thomas, J. )
Concurrence/Dissent (Souter, J.)
What to do next…
Unlock this case brief with a free (no-commitment) trial membership of Quimbee.
You’ll be in good company: Quimbee is one of the most widely used and trusted sites for law students, serving more than 617,000 law students since 2011. Some law schools—such as Yale, Berkeley, and Northwestern—even subscribe directly to Quimbee for all their law students.Unlock this case briefRead our student testimonials
Learn more about Quimbee’s unique (and proven) approach to achieving great grades at law school.
Quimbee is a company hell-bent on one thing: helping you get an “A” in every course you take in law school, so you can graduate at the top of your class and get a high-paying law job. We’re not just a study aid for law students; we’re the study aid for law students.Learn about our approachRead more about Quimbee
Here's why 617,000 law students have relied on our case briefs:
- Written by law professors and practitioners, not other law students. 35,400 briefs, keyed to 984 casebooks. Top-notch customer support.
- The right amount of information, includes the facts, issues, rule of law, holding and reasoning, and any concurrences and dissents.
- Access in your classes, works on your mobile and tablet. Massive library of related video lessons and high quality multiple-choice questions.
- Easy to use, uniform format for every case brief. Written in plain English, not in legalese. Our briefs summarize and simplify; they don’t just repeat the court’s language.