Atlanta Athletic Club v. Commissioner
United States Court of Appeals for the Eleventh Circuit
980 F.2d 1409 (1993)
- Written by Daniel Clark, JD
Facts
The Atlanta Athletic Club (club) (plaintiff) was a tax-exempt social club under § 501(c)(7) of the Internal Revenue Code (code). The club owned a large mass of land that was split in two by a highway. The club developed its principal amenities—golf courses, tennis courts, a pool, and a clubhouse—on the tract east of the highway (eastside property). Apart from an abandoned attempt at building a jogging track, the club did not develop the tract west of the highway (westside property). Club members and employees testified about activities held on the westside property, despite the property’s nondevelopment. These activities included hot-air balloon rides, footraces, fishing tournaments, and Easter egg hunts. The westside property was also a popular jogging spot for many members. Two decades after acquiring the large mass of land, the club sold a large portion of the westside property, generating a $2.3 million profit. The club reinvested the profits into improving its facilities. The Internal Revenue Service (IRS) (defendant) treated the $2.3 million as unrelated business taxable income to the club. The club challenged that determination in the United States Tax Court. The Tax Court ruled in favor of the IRS, holding that the club did not directly use the westside property for recreation before selling it, as required by statute for the gain to escape tax. The club appealed.
Rule of Law
Issue
Holding and Reasoning (Cox, J.)
What to do next…
Here's why 810,000 law students have relied on our case briefs:
- Written by law professors and practitioners, not other law students. 46,300 briefs, keyed to 988 casebooks. Top-notch customer support.
- The right amount of information, includes the facts, issues, rule of law, holding and reasoning, and any concurrences and dissents.
- Access in your classes, works on your mobile and tablet. Massive library of related video lessons and high quality multiple-choice questions.
- Easy to use, uniform format for every case brief. Written in plain English, not in legalese. Our briefs summarize and simplify; they don’t just repeat the court’s language.