Atlantic Richfield Co. v. Arco Globus International Co.
United States Court of Appeals for the Second Circuit
150 F.3d 189 (1998)
- Written by Wesley Bernhardt , JD
Facts
The Atlantic Refining Company began using the name “ARCO” for the sale of lubricants. Atlantic Refining Company eventually became Atlantic Richfield Co. (ARCO) (plaintiff). In 1987, ARCO began using the name “ARCO” for all of its sales of petroleum products. Arco Globus International Co. (AGI) (defendant) formed in 1990 and was in the business of identifying oil products for its parent company, Arco Globus Company, Ltd. (AGC) to sell. AGI opened an office in Moscow, Russia, in 1990 and began trading oil products in Russia in 1991. Although AGI had a New York office with two employees, it never traded or sold products in the United States, and it attempted unsuccessfully to start a petroleum joint venture in Texas. ARCO filed suit in the United States, but the district court dismissed the suit on the grounds that the Lanham Act did not reach AGI’s conduct. ARCO appealed.
Rule of Law
Issue
Holding and Reasoning (Winter, C.J.)
What to do next…
Here's why 832,000 law students have relied on our case briefs:
- Written by law professors and practitioners, not other law students. 46,500 briefs, keyed to 994 casebooks. Top-notch customer support.
- The right amount of information, includes the facts, issues, rule of law, holding and reasoning, and any concurrences and dissents.
- Access in your classes, works on your mobile and tablet. Massive library of related video lessons and high quality multiple-choice questions.
- Easy to use, uniform format for every case brief. Written in plain English, not in legalese. Our briefs summarize and simplify; they don’t just repeat the court’s language.