Atlas Tool Co. v. Commissioner
United States Court of Appeals for the Third Circuit
614 F.2d 860 (1980)
- Written by Heather Ryfa, JD
Facts
Stephan Schaffan (plaintiff) was the sole shareholder of two corporations, Atlas Tool Company, Inc. (Atlas) (plaintiff) and Fletcher Plastics, Inc. (Fletcher), which was dissolved in 1970 through the sale of all its machinery, equipment, and inventory to Atlas. Atlas hired all of Fletcher’s employees and, after a brief period of time, resumed use of the transferred machinery and equipment to make the same products that Fletcher had previously manufactured. Schaffan received a cash distribution from the transaction of $482,246.82, which he reported on his income tax return as a $390,000 long-term capital gain due to a complete liquidation under § 331 of the Internal Revenue Code. The commissioner of the Internal Revenue Service (defendant) issued a deficiency, asserting that the distribution was a reorganization under § 368 of the Internal Revenue Code and that, therefore, the cash distribution was boot that was taxable as ordinary income. The United States Tax Court held that the transaction was a reorganization, that Fletcher’s earnings of $440,342.56 were a dividend taxable as ordinary income to Schaffan, and that the remainder of the distribution was long-term capital gain. Both Schaffan and the commissioner appealed the decision.
Rule of Law
Issue
Holding and Reasoning (Gibbons, J.)
What to do next…
Here's why 812,000 law students have relied on our case briefs:
- Written by law professors and practitioners, not other law students. 46,300 briefs, keyed to 988 casebooks. Top-notch customer support.
- The right amount of information, includes the facts, issues, rule of law, holding and reasoning, and any concurrences and dissents.
- Access in your classes, works on your mobile and tablet. Massive library of related video lessons and high quality multiple-choice questions.
- Easy to use, uniform format for every case brief. Written in plain English, not in legalese. Our briefs summarize and simplify; they don’t just repeat the court’s language.