Attorney Grievance Commission of Maryland v. Kendrick
Maryland Court of Appeals
943 A.2d 1173 (2008)
- Written by Rose VanHofwegen, JD
Facts
Judith Kerr died in 1999 having appointed her brother, Oliver Kerr, and her close friend Karin Kendrick (defendant), an attorney, to become co-personal representatives over Judith’s $60,000 estate. Evidently Kendrick had no experience in probate matters, did not know how to administer an estate, and repeatedly failed to file many of the necessary documents. The court issued multiple delinquency notices directing Kendrick and Oliver to file the documents and granted extensions they failed to meet, followed by summonses and requests to show cause why the documents had not been filed. In one instance, the court issued no less than six delinquency notices for failure to make requisite filings. Despite repeated interactions with the probate court, Oliver and Kendrick did not seek assistance in administering Judith’s estate. After three years, the court itself initiated a petition to remove them as co-personal representatives, removed them, and ordered them to file a final administration account and turn over all assets and financial records within 30 days. Oliver and Kendrick failed to do so, resulting in civil contempt sanctions. All told, it took nearly nine years to close Judith’s estate. The following year, the Attorney Grievance Commission of Maryland (plaintiff) filed grievance proceedings seeking sanctions against Kendrick. The judge concluded that Kendrick violated the ethics rule requiring competence, and Kendrick appealed.
Rule of Law
Issue
Holding and Reasoning (Greene, J.)
What to do next…
Here's why 802,000 law students have relied on our case briefs:
- Written by law professors and practitioners, not other law students. 46,300 briefs, keyed to 988 casebooks. Top-notch customer support.
- The right amount of information, includes the facts, issues, rule of law, holding and reasoning, and any concurrences and dissents.
- Access in your classes, works on your mobile and tablet. Massive library of related video lessons and high quality multiple-choice questions.
- Easy to use, uniform format for every case brief. Written in plain English, not in legalese. Our briefs summarize and simplify; they don’t just repeat the court’s language.