From our private database of 28,700+ case briefs...
Auer v. Robbins
United States Supreme Court
519 U.S. 452, 117 S.Ct. 905, 137 L.Ed.2d 79 (1997)
A group of police officers (plaintiffs) brought an action against members of the board of police commissioners (defendants) seeking payment of overtime pay under the Fair Labor Standards Act (FLSA). The defendants claimed that the plaintiffs were not entitled to overtime pay because they were exempt employees under the FLSA. Pursuant to regulations promulgated by the Secretary of Labor (Secretary), one of the requirements to be considered an exempt employee under the FLSA was that the employee earn a specific minimum amount of compensation on a salary basis, i.e., that the employee receive regular predetermined pay at set intervals, with the amount of compensation not subject to decrease because of variations in the employee's quantity or quality of work performed. The plaintiffs claimed they did not meet the salary-basis requirement because the police manual provided that officers' compensation could be reduced for some disciplinary infractions based on their quantity or quality of work. The plaintiffs also claimed that they did not meet other requirements to be exempt employees under the FLSA, including that their duties were not executive, administrative, or professional. The district court found that the plaintiffs satisfied the salary-basis requirement and that most plaintiffs satisfied the duties requirement. The appellate court concluded that all plaintiffs satisfied both the salary-basis and duties requirements and were thus exempt employees under the FLSA who were not entitled to overtime pay. The United States Supreme Court granted certiorari.
Rule of Law
Holding and Reasoning (Scalia, J.)
What to do next…
Unlock this case brief with a free (no-commitment) trial membership of Quimbee.
You’ll be in good company: Quimbee is one of the most widely used and trusted sites for law students, serving more than 546,000 law students since 2011. Some law schools—such as Yale, Berkeley, and Northwestern—even subscribe directly to Quimbee for all their law students.Unlock this case briefRead our student testimonials
Learn more about Quimbee’s unique (and proven) approach to achieving great grades at law school.
Quimbee is a company hell-bent on one thing: helping you get an “A” in every course you take in law school, so you can graduate at the top of your class and get a high-paying law job. We’re not just a study aid for law students; we’re the study aid for law students.Learn about our approachRead more about Quimbee
Here's why 546,000 law students have relied on our case briefs:
- Written by law professors and practitioners, not other law students. 28,700 briefs, keyed to 984 casebooks. Top-notch customer support.
- The right amount of information, includes the facts, issues, rule of law, holding and reasoning, and any concurrences and dissents.
- Access in your classes, works on your mobile and tablet. Massive library of related video lessons and high quality multiple-choice questions.
- Easy to use, uniform format for every case brief. Written in plain English, not in legalese. Our briefs summarize and simplify; they don’t just repeat the court’s language.