Quimbee logo
DMCA.com Protection Status

Aumand v. Dartmouth Hitchcock Medical Center

611 F. Supp. 2d 78 (2009)

Case BriefRelatedOptions
From our private database of 32,200+ case briefs...

Aumand v. Dartmouth Hitchcock Medical Center

United States District Court for the District of New Hampshire

611 F. Supp. 2d 78 (2009)

Play video

Facts

Dartmouth Hitchcock Medical Center (defendant) readmitted Katherine Coffey two days after bypass surgery. Detecting low blood sugar, personnel administered glucose D-50 through a catheter in her hand. When someone noticed that Katherine’s hand had swollen and turned blue, personnel moved the catheter to her elbow. Katherine’s son James approached a man in a nearby corridor by the nurse’s station, asking if he had seen or touched Katherine’s hand. James said the man stated that “it was an injection of D-50 into the tissue of her hand. Someone had made a mistake. He had never seen anything like it.” Katherine eventually had fingers amputated because of glucose infiltration and developed a MRSA infection that caused a fatal heart attack. Her husband, Francis Coffey, and the executor of her estate, Deborah Aumand (plaintiffs), sued the hospital for negligent medical care. The man James spoke to in the hospital corridor could not be identified or called as a witness. James did not remember anything about him except his height and had simply assumed he was a nurse or a physician’s assistant because of where he met him. The hospital filed a pretrial motion to exclude the man’s statements as hearsay. Coffey argued the statements were admissible as admissions by a party-opponent.

Rule of Law

Issue

Holding and Reasoning (Laplante, J.)

What to do next…

  1. Unlock this case brief with a free (no-commitment) trial membership of Quimbee.

    You’ll be in good company: Quimbee is one of the most widely used and trusted sites for law students, serving more than 585,000 law students since 2011. Some law schools—such as Yale, Berkeley, and Northwestern—even subscribe directly to Quimbee for all their law students.

    Unlock this case briefRead our student testimonials
  2. Learn more about Quimbee’s unique (and proven) approach to achieving great grades at law school.

    Quimbee is a company hell-bent on one thing: helping you get an “A” in every course you take in law school, so you can graduate at the top of your class and get a high-paying law job. We’re not just a study aid for law students; we’re the study aid for law students.

    Learn about our approachRead more about Quimbee

Here's why 585,000 law students have relied on our case briefs:

  • Written by law professors and practitioners, not other law students. 32,200 briefs, keyed to 984 casebooks. Top-notch customer support.
  • The right amount of information, includes the facts, issues, rule of law, holding and reasoning, and any concurrences and dissents.
  • Access in your classes, works on your mobile and tablet. Massive library of related video lessons and high quality multiple-choice questions.
  • Easy to use, uniform format for every case brief. Written in plain English, not in legalese. Our briefs summarize and simplify; they don’t just repeat the court’s language.

Access this case brief for FREE

With a 7-day free trial membership
Here's why 585,000 law students have relied on our case briefs:
  • Reliable - written by law professors and practitioners, not other law students
  • The right length and amount of information - includes the facts, issue, rule of law, holding and reasoning, and any concurrences and dissents
  • Access in your class - works on your mobile and tablet
  • 32,200 briefs - keyed to 984 casebooks
  • Uniform format for every case brief
  • Written in plain English - not in legalese and not just repeating the court's language
  • Massive library of related video lessons - and practice questions
  • Top-notch customer support

Access this case brief for FREE

With a 7-day free trial membership