Aurelio Cal v. Attorney General of Belize

Claim 121/2007 (2007)

From our private database of 46,500+ case briefs, written and edited by humans—never with AI.

Aurelio Cal v. Attorney General of Belize

Belize Supreme Court
Claim 121/2007 (2007)

Facts

Belize (defendant) granted logging concessions and oil-exploration licenses in the traditional lands of the Maya people. A Maya cultural association (the association) filed suit, but the action was never fully heard. The association brought a petition to the Inter-American Commission on Human Rights (IACHR), which recognized and affirmed the Maya property rights to the affected lands. Based on the IACHR’s report, members of the Maya villages of Santa Cruz and Conejo (collectively, the Maya) (plaintiffs) brought another action in the domestic courts. The Maya claimed that Maya customary land rights created interests in their traditional lands that were constitutionally protected. The Maya cited an agreement between Belize and various Maya organizations that appeared to endorse the existence of the Maya rights to land and resources in the area. The Maya alleged that Belize had violated the constitution in failing to recognize and protect the Maya property rights. Belize argued that Spanish and British sovereignty over the land had extinguished any land rights the Maya previously possessed.

Rule of Law

Issue

Holding and Reasoning (Conteh, C.J.)

What to do next…

  1. Unlock this case brief with a free (no-commitment) trial membership of Quimbee.

    You’ll be in good company: Quimbee is one of the most widely used and trusted sites for law students, serving more than 832,000 law students since 2011. Some law schools even subscribe directly to Quimbee for all their law students.

  2. Learn more about Quimbee’s unique (and proven) approach to achieving great grades at law school.

    Quimbee is a company hell-bent on one thing: helping you get an “A” in every course you take in law school, so you can graduate at the top of your class and get a high-paying law job. We’re not just a study aid for law students; we’re the study aid for law students.

Here's why 832,000 law students have relied on our case briefs:

  • Written by law professors and practitioners, not other law students. 46,500 briefs, keyed to 994 casebooks. Top-notch customer support.
  • The right amount of information, includes the facts, issues, rule of law, holding and reasoning, and any concurrences and dissents.
  • Access in your classes, works on your mobile and tablet. Massive library of related video lessons and high quality multiple-choice questions.
  • Easy to use, uniform format for every case brief. Written in plain English, not in legalese. Our briefs summarize and simplify; they don’t just repeat the court’s language.

Access this case brief for FREE

With a 7-day free trial membership
Here's why 832,000 law students have relied on our case briefs:
  • Reliable - written by law professors and practitioners, not other law students
  • The right length and amount of information - includes the facts, issue, rule of law, holding and reasoning, and any concurrences and dissents
  • Access in your class - works on your mobile and tablet
  • 46,500 briefs - keyed to 994 casebooks
  • Uniform format for every case brief
  • Written in plain English - not in legalese and not just repeating the court's language
  • Massive library of related video lessons - and practice questions
  • Top-notch customer support

Access this case brief for FREE

With a 7-day free trial membership