Austin Hill Country Realty, Inc. v. Palisades Plaza, Inc.
Supreme Court of Texas
948 S.W.2d 293 (1997)

- Written by Sara Rhee, JD
Facts
Palisades Plaza, Inc. (Palisades) (plaintiff) owned an office complex in Austin, Texas. On September 15, 1992, Palisades entered a five-year commercial office lease with Austin Hill Country Realty, Inc. (Hill Country) (defendant). Hill Country was a real estate brokerage franchise run by Barbara Hill, Annette Smith, and David Jones. The anticipated start date was November 15, 1992. One provision of the lease required Palisades to make improvements on the office. In October 1992, Palisades received conflicting instructions on how to proceed with improvements. Palisades informed Hill, Smith, and Jones that it was suspending improvements until they designated a representative to communicate decisions to Palisades. Hill, Smith, and Jones did not reply. On November 19, 1992, Palisades wrote to inform Hill Country that it considered their failure to select a representative an anticipatory breach of contract. Palisades subsequently brought suit for anticipatory breach. At trial, Hill Country sought an instruction that told the jury to reduce any damages by the amount that Palisades could have avoided by exercising reasonable care. The trial judge refused to allow the instruction. The jury found in favor of Palisades and granted damages in the amount of $29,716. The court of appeals affirmed.
Rule of Law
Issue
Holding and Reasoning (Spector, J.)
What to do next…
Here's why 815,000 law students have relied on our case briefs:
- Written by law professors and practitioners, not other law students. 46,300 briefs, keyed to 988 casebooks. Top-notch customer support.
- The right amount of information, includes the facts, issues, rule of law, holding and reasoning, and any concurrences and dissents.
- Access in your classes, works on your mobile and tablet. Massive library of related video lessons and high quality multiple-choice questions.
- Easy to use, uniform format for every case brief. Written in plain English, not in legalese. Our briefs summarize and simplify; they don’t just repeat the court’s language.