Austin v. Commissioner

35 T.C. 221 (1960)

From our private database of 47,000+ case briefs, written and edited by humans—never with AI.

Austin v. Commissioner

United States Tax Court
35 T.C. 221 (1960)

Facts

James Austin (plaintiff) was a director, an officer, and general counsel for the DeLaval Separator and Steam Turbine Companies (companies). Prior to 1949, the companies’ corporate offices were in New York City. During that time, Austin and his family lived in Connecticut, within commuting distance of New York City. In 1947, Austin was advised that the companies’ offices might relocate to Poughkeepsie, New York. Anticipating this move, Austin purchased a 220-acre property in Millbrook, New York, in August 1950 for $28,000. Austin thought this property was an excellent bargain from a profit standpoint. He immediately began making improvements totaling $44,250, and by November 1950, he sold his Connecticut home. In April 1951, the companies’ officers decided to keep their corporate offices in New York City. Nevertheless, Austin and his family moved to the Millbrook property the following month. Within a week, however, Austin had canceled all renovations and put the property up for sale. The family returned to Connecticut in August 1954. On March 18, 1955, Austin sold part of the Millbrook property for $31,500, sustaining a $30,000 loss based on a $61,500 adjusted basis. Austin deducted this loss on his 1955 federal tax return. The commissioner of the Internal Revenue Service (defendant) disallowed the deduction, asserting that Austin failed to meet § 165’s requirements. Austin petitioned the tax court for a redetermination.

Rule of Law

Issue

Holding and Reasoning (Arundell, J.)

What to do next…

  1. Unlock this case brief with a free (no-commitment) trial membership of Quimbee.

    You’ll be in good company: Quimbee is one of the most widely used and trusted sites for law students, serving more than 899,000 law students since 2011. Some law schools even subscribe directly to Quimbee for all their law students.

  2. Learn more about Quimbee’s unique (and proven) approach to achieving great grades at law school.

    Quimbee is a company hell-bent on one thing: helping you get an “A” in every course you take in law school, so you can graduate at the top of your class and get a high-paying law job. We’re not just a study aid for law students; we’re the study aid for law students.

Here's why 899,000 law students have relied on our case briefs:

  • Written by law professors and practitioners, not other law students. 47,000 briefs, keyed to 994 casebooks. Top-notch customer support.
  • The right amount of information, includes the facts, issues, rule of law, holding and reasoning, and any concurrences and dissents.
  • Access in your classes, works on your mobile and tablet. Massive library of related video lessons and high quality multiple-choice questions.
  • Easy to use, uniform format for every case brief. Written in plain English, not in legalese. Our briefs summarize and simplify; they don’t just repeat the court’s language.

Access this case brief for FREE

With a 7-day free trial membership
Here's why 899,000 law students have relied on our case briefs:
  • Reliable - written by law professors and practitioners, not other law students
  • The right length and amount of information - includes the facts, issue, rule of law, holding and reasoning, and any concurrences and dissents
  • Access in your class - works on your mobile and tablet
  • 47,000 briefs - keyed to 994 casebooks
  • Uniform format for every case brief
  • Written in plain English - not in legalese and not just repeating the court's language
  • Massive library of related video lessons - and practice questions
  • Top-notch customer support

Access this case brief for FREE

With a 7-day free trial membership