Authors Guild v. Google Inc.

770 F. Supp. 2d 666 (2011)

From our private database of 46,300+ case briefs, written and edited by humans—never with AI.

Authors Guild v. Google Inc.

United States District Court for the Southern District of New York
770 F. Supp. 2d 666 (2011)

  • Written by Melanie Moultry, JD
Play video

Facts

Google Inc. (defendant) scanned millions of books into an electronic database designed for use by research libraries. Google made snippets of book text available for online searching. Though many of the books were under copyright protection, Google did not obtain permission from the copyright owners to scan them. In 2005, various authors and publishers (plaintiffs) brought a class-action lawsuit against Google, claiming that Google’s use of the snippets constituted copyright infringement. Google claimed fair use as a defense under the § 107 of the Copyright Act, which allows the unauthorized use of copyrightable work for purposes such as scholarship and research. The court approved an Amended Settlement Agreement (ASA) in 2009. Among other things, the ASA allowed Google to sell access to an electronic-books database, share revenues with copyright holders, and establish a registry to distribute revenue from sources including orphan books and other unclaimed works. The ASA required Google to obtain prior, express authorization from copyright holders to use in-print books, but not out-of-print books. The ASA also allowed copyright holders to opt out of the database upon request. Several class-action members objected to Google’s ability to use copyrighted works without obtaining prior, express authorization. The plaintiffs filed a motion under Rule 23 of the Federal Rules of Civil Procedure (FRCP) for final approval of the class-action settlement under the ASA’s terms.

Rule of Law

Issue

Holding and Reasoning (Chin, J.)

What to do next…

  1. Unlock this case brief with a free (no-commitment) trial membership of Quimbee.

    You’ll be in good company: Quimbee is one of the most widely used and trusted sites for law students, serving more than 803,000 law students since 2011. Some law schools—such as Yale, Berkeley, and Northwestern—even subscribe directly to Quimbee for all their law students.

    Unlock this case briefRead our student testimonials
  2. Learn more about Quimbee’s unique (and proven) approach to achieving great grades at law school.

    Quimbee is a company hell-bent on one thing: helping you get an “A” in every course you take in law school, so you can graduate at the top of your class and get a high-paying law job. We’re not just a study aid for law students; we’re the study aid for law students.

    Learn about our approachRead more about Quimbee

Here's why 803,000 law students have relied on our case briefs:

  • Written by law professors and practitioners, not other law students. 46,300 briefs, keyed to 988 casebooks. Top-notch customer support.
  • The right amount of information, includes the facts, issues, rule of law, holding and reasoning, and any concurrences and dissents.
  • Access in your classes, works on your mobile and tablet. Massive library of related video lessons and high quality multiple-choice questions.
  • Easy to use, uniform format for every case brief. Written in plain English, not in legalese. Our briefs summarize and simplify; they don’t just repeat the court’s language.

Access this case brief for FREE

With a 7-day free trial membership
Here's why 803,000 law students have relied on our case briefs:
  • Reliable - written by law professors and practitioners, not other law students
  • The right length and amount of information - includes the facts, issue, rule of law, holding and reasoning, and any concurrences and dissents
  • Access in your class - works on your mobile and tablet
  • 46,300 briefs - keyed to 988 casebooks
  • Uniform format for every case brief
  • Written in plain English - not in legalese and not just repeating the court's language
  • Massive library of related video lessons - and practice questions
  • Top-notch customer support

Access this case brief for FREE

With a 7-day free trial membership