Avila-Anguiano v. Holder
United States Court of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit
2012 WL 3181618 (2012)
- Written by Carolyn Strutton, JD
Facts
Jose Avila-Anguiano (plaintiff) was a Mexican national who twice made a misrepresentation to United States border authorities during attempts to enter the United States. In the first instance in 1991, Avila-Anguiano falsely claimed that he was a United States citizen. He pled guilty to the charge of making a false claim of citizenship and was returned to Mexico. In 1993, Avila-Anguiano made a second misrepresentation when he failed to disclose that earlier conviction on his visa application. By this time, Avila-Anguiano was married to a United States citizen, and his visa application was approved. The United States (defendant) later began removal proceedings against Avila-Anguiano when these misrepresentations came to light. Avila-Anguiano sought to have the misrepresentations waived as grounds for removal as allowed under certain provisions of the Immigration and Nationality Act (INA). The government contended that under the INA only misrepresentations made at the time of an otherwise lawful admission attempt may be waived and therefore only the 1993 misrepresentation could be waived under the statute, and that Avila-Anguiano must still face deportation for the 1991 misrepresentation. The matter came before the Board of Immigration Appeals, which agreed with the government’s contention. Avila-Anguiano brought a petition for court review of the decision.
Rule of Law
Issue
Holding and Reasoning (Kethledge, J.)
What to do next…
Here's why 779,000 law students have relied on our case briefs:
- Written by law professors and practitioners, not other law students. 46,200 briefs, keyed to 988 casebooks. Top-notch customer support.
- The right amount of information, includes the facts, issues, rule of law, holding and reasoning, and any concurrences and dissents.
- Access in your classes, works on your mobile and tablet. Massive library of related video lessons and high quality multiple-choice questions.
- Easy to use, uniform format for every case brief. Written in plain English, not in legalese. Our briefs summarize and simplify; they don’t just repeat the court’s language.