Logourl black
From our private database of 14,000+ case briefs...

Avitts v. Amoco Production Co.

United States Court of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit
53 F.3d 690 (5th Cir. 1995)


Facts

Avitts (plaintiffs) filed suit against Amoco Production Co. and several other oil companies (defendants) in Texas state court. The plaintiffs and at least one of the defendants were citizens of the same state. The plaintiffs claimed that their property was damaged by the defendants’ activities in the West Hastings Field. In the original complaint, the plaintiffs asserted that the evidence would show that the defendants had violated “not only State law but also Federal law.” No other reference to violations of federal law was made in the original complaint or any of the numerous amended complaints. The plaintiffs later did mention the Comprehensive Environmental Response, Compensation, and Liability Act (CERCLA) and the Oil Pollution Act of 1990 (OPA) in the Joint Pretrial Order (PTO) as a means for assessing the damages, but did not state a cause of action under either act. The defendants filed notice of removal to the United States District Court for the Southern District of Texas at the same time they moved the court for a more definite statement under Fed. R. Civ. P. 12(e). The motion for a more definite statement was denied, and the case was removed to federal court. The district court issued a preliminary injunction against the defendants, ordering them to complete an environmental study. The defendants were also ordered to pay $650,000 in interim costs and fees. The defendants’ appeals were consolidated in the United States Court of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit.

Rule of Law

The rule of law is the black letter law upon which the court rested its decision.

To access this section, please start your free trial or log in.

Issue

The issue section includes the dispositive legal issue in the case phrased as a question.

To access this section, please start your free trial or log in.

Holding and Reasoning (Per Curium)

The holding and reasoning section includes:

  • A "yes" or "no" answer to the question framed in the issue section;
  • A summary of the majority or plurality opinion, using the CREAC method; and
  • The procedural disposition (e.g. reversed and remanded, affirmed, etc.).

To access this section, please start your free trial or log in.

What to do next…

  1. Unlock this case brief with a free (no-commitment) trial membership of Quimbee.

    You’ll be in good company: Quimbee is one of the most widely used and trusted sites for law students, serving more than 97,000 law students since 2011. Some law schools—such as Yale, Vanderbilt, Berkeley, and the University of Illinois—even subscribe directly to Quimbee for all their law students. Read our student testimonials.

  2. Learn more about Quimbee’s unique (and proven) approach to achieving great grades at law school.

    Quimbee is a company hell-bent on one thing: helping you get an “A” in every course you take in law school, so you can graduate at the top of your class and get a high-paying law job. We’re not just a study aid for law students; we’re the study aid for law students. Read more about Quimbee.

Here's why 200,000 law students have relied on our case briefs:

  • Written by law professors and practitioners, not other law students. 14,000 briefs, keyed to 188 casebooks. Top-notch customer support.
  • The right amount of information, includes the facts, issues, rule of law, holding and reasoning, and any concurrences and dissents.
  • Access in your classes, works on your mobile and tablet. Massive library of related video lessons and high quality multiple-choice questions.
  • Easy to use, uniform format for every case brief. Written in plain English, not in legalese. Our briefs summarize and simplify; they don’t just repeat the court’s language.