Avola v. Louisiana-Pacific Corp.

81 UCC Rep. Serv. 2d 509 (2013)

From our private database of 46,500+ case briefs, written and edited by humans—never with AI.

Avola v. Louisiana-Pacific Corp.

United States District Court for the Eastern District of New York
81 UCC Rep. Serv. 2d 509 (2013)

  • Written by Sharon Feldman, JD

Facts

Anthony Avola (plaintiff) was an experienced carpenter. Home Depot USA, Inc. (Home Depot) (defendant) sold LP SmartSide, a type of composite-wood siding product manufactured by Louisiana-Pacific Corp. (LP) (defendant). LP’s website stated that SmartSide products “work[ed] and cut just like traditional wood, taking nails and screws with ease.” Avola went to Home Depot to buy siding for a shed. Avola purchased T1-11 siding, a type of wood siding he had used before. Avola was about to leave when a sales associate suggested Avola try SmartSide, stating that it “nails just like wood,” “works as easy as traditional wood siding,” and could be installed the same way as the T1-11 siding. Avola had not heard about SmartSide and had not seen the advertisement on the LP website. Avola purchased SmartSide. When Avola began nailing in the panels, the nails would not stay in place, and Avola had to hammer them more than once. Avola had hammered in about 100 nails when a nail that he was hammering ricocheted into his eye. Avola sued LP and Home Depot for breach of express warranty and false advertising. LP and Home Depot moved for summary judgment.

Rule of Law

Issue

Holding and Reasoning (Chen, J.)

What to do next…

  1. Unlock this case brief with a free (no-commitment) trial membership of Quimbee.

    You’ll be in good company: Quimbee is one of the most widely used and trusted sites for law students, serving more than 832,000 law students since 2011. Some law schools even subscribe directly to Quimbee for all their law students.

  2. Learn more about Quimbee’s unique (and proven) approach to achieving great grades at law school.

    Quimbee is a company hell-bent on one thing: helping you get an “A” in every course you take in law school, so you can graduate at the top of your class and get a high-paying law job. We’re not just a study aid for law students; we’re the study aid for law students.

Here's why 832,000 law students have relied on our case briefs:

  • Written by law professors and practitioners, not other law students. 46,500 briefs, keyed to 994 casebooks. Top-notch customer support.
  • The right amount of information, includes the facts, issues, rule of law, holding and reasoning, and any concurrences and dissents.
  • Access in your classes, works on your mobile and tablet. Massive library of related video lessons and high quality multiple-choice questions.
  • Easy to use, uniform format for every case brief. Written in plain English, not in legalese. Our briefs summarize and simplify; they don’t just repeat the court’s language.

Access this case brief for FREE

With a 7-day free trial membership
Here's why 832,000 law students have relied on our case briefs:
  • Reliable - written by law professors and practitioners, not other law students
  • The right length and amount of information - includes the facts, issue, rule of law, holding and reasoning, and any concurrences and dissents
  • Access in your class - works on your mobile and tablet
  • 46,500 briefs - keyed to 994 casebooks
  • Uniform format for every case brief
  • Written in plain English - not in legalese and not just repeating the court's language
  • Massive library of related video lessons - and practice questions
  • Top-notch customer support

Access this case brief for FREE

With a 7-day free trial membership