Quimbee logo
DMCA.com Protection Status

Ayers v. Coughlin

530 N.E.2d 373 (1988)

Case BriefRelatedOptions
From our private database of 30,900+ case briefs...

Ayers v. Coughlin

New York Court of Appeals

530 N.E.2d 373 (1988)

Facts

New York had a dual correction system made up of county jails and state prisons. State defendants who would eventually be sentenced to prison could be held in a county jail until they were convicted and sentenced. New York State Criminal Procedure Law 430.20(1) (CPL 430.20(1)) provided that when a prison sentence is imposed, a defendant must be transferred to a state prison forthwith. Due to prison overcrowding, the New York State Department of Correctional Services (the department) had a policy of delaying its acceptance of state prisoners from county jails for six months or more according to regulations it promulgated itself. A group of county sheriffs (collectively, the sheriffs) (plaintiffs), including James Ayers, filed a lawsuit in state court seeking to compel the commissioner of the department (the commissioner) (defendant), Thomas Coughlin, to accept state prisoners from county jails within 48 hours of their sentencing. The New York Supreme Court held that due to its use of the term forthwith, CPL 430.20(1) required the department to accept state prisoners within 10 days of their sentencing. The commissioner appealed. The appellate division held that the supreme court could not order the department to accept state prisoners within 10 days of their sentencing. Instead, the appellate division held that the department could continue to use its own regulations to determine when to transfer a state prisoner. The sheriffs appealed.

Rule of Law

Issue

Holding and Reasoning (Kaye, J.)

What to do next…

  1. Unlock this case brief with a free (no-commitment) trial membership of Quimbee.

    You’ll be in good company: Quimbee is one of the most widely used and trusted sites for law students, serving more than 551,000 law students since 2011. Some law schools—such as Yale, Berkeley, and Northwestern—even subscribe directly to Quimbee for all their law students.

    Unlock this case briefRead our student testimonials
  2. Learn more about Quimbee’s unique (and proven) approach to achieving great grades at law school.

    Quimbee is a company hell-bent on one thing: helping you get an “A” in every course you take in law school, so you can graduate at the top of your class and get a high-paying law job. We’re not just a study aid for law students; we’re the study aid for law students.

    Learn about our approachRead more about Quimbee

Here's why 551,000 law students have relied on our case briefs:

  • Written by law professors and practitioners, not other law students. 30,900 briefs, keyed to 984 casebooks. Top-notch customer support.
  • The right amount of information, includes the facts, issues, rule of law, holding and reasoning, and any concurrences and dissents.
  • Access in your classes, works on your mobile and tablet. Massive library of related video lessons and high quality multiple-choice questions.
  • Easy to use, uniform format for every case brief. Written in plain English, not in legalese. Our briefs summarize and simplify; they don’t just repeat the court’s language.

Access this case brief for FREE

With a 7-day free trial membership
Here's why 551,000 law students have relied on our case briefs:
  • Reliable - written by law professors and practitioners, not other law students
  • The right length and amount of information - includes the facts, issue, rule of law, holding and reasoning, and any concurrences and dissents
  • Access in your class - works on your mobile and tablet
  • 30,900 briefs - keyed to 984 casebooks
  • Uniform format for every case brief
  • Written in plain English - not in legalese and not just repeating the court's language
  • Massive library of related video lessons - and practice questions
  • Top-notch customer support

Access this case brief for FREE

With a 7-day free trial membership