Quimbee logo
DMCA.com Protection Status
  • B
  • B.B.P. Corporation v. CarrollB.B.P. Corporation v. Carroll
From our private database of 16,800+ case briefs...

B.B.P. Corporation v. Carroll

Alaska Supreme Court
760 P.2d 519 (1988)


The University Heights Subdivision, comprising 95 lots, was subject to various restrictive covenants, including Covenant Five, requiring tenants to cut all poplar, cottonwood, and aspen trees on their properties, and Covenant Six, requiring all downhill lot owners to cut trees obstructing the view of an uphill lot owner upon request. The property plat provided that all covenants would remain in effect unless modified or repealed by agreement between the board of trustees of B.B.P. Corporation (BBP) (plaintiff) and at least three-quarters of all lot owners. It turned out that strict compliance with Covenant Five was nearly impossible, as poplar, cottonwood, and aspen trees reseed themselves and spring back extremely quickly. For this reason, none of the lots, including that of BBP’s president, fully complied with Covenant Five. Lot owners, however, did appear to comply with Covenant Six to the extent requests to do so were made. In March 1986, a newly elected board of trustees unanimously voted to repeal Covenants Five and Six, and recorded the modification. A few days prior, BBP had filed suit against several lot owners, including Carroll (defendants), to enforce Covenants Five and Six. Carroll and the other owners moved for summary judgment, contending that the covenants were no longer in force because they were officially repealed by the board of trustees’ vote, or in any event, were unofficially abandoned by the residents due to consistent and widespread noncompliance. The court granted Carroll’s motion for summary judgment. BBP appealed.

Rule of Law


Holding and Reasoning (Rabinowitz, J.)

What to do next…

  1. Unlock this case brief with a free (no-commitment) trial membership of Quimbee.

    You’ll be in good company: Quimbee is one of the most widely used and trusted sites for law students, serving more than 449,000 law students since 2011. Some law schools—such as Yale, Vanderbilt, Berkeley, and the University of Illinois—even subscribe directly to Quimbee for all their law students. Read our student testimonials.

  2. Learn more about Quimbee’s unique (and proven) approach to achieving great grades at law school.

    Quimbee is a company hell-bent on one thing: helping you get an “A” in every course you take in law school, so you can graduate at the top of your class and get a high-paying law job. We’re not just a study aid for law students; we’re the study aid for law students. Read more about Quimbee.

Here's why 449,000 law students have relied on our case briefs:

  • Written by law professors and practitioners, not other law students. 16,800 briefs, keyed to 224 casebooks. Top-notch customer support.
  • The right amount of information, includes the facts, issues, rule of law, holding and reasoning, and any concurrences and dissents.
  • Access in your classes, works on your mobile and tablet. Massive library of related video lessons and high quality multiple-choice questions.
  • Easy to use, uniform format for every case brief. Written in plain English, not in legalese. Our briefs summarize and simplify; they don’t just repeat the court’s language.

Questions & Answers

Have a question about this case?

Sign up for a free 7-day trial and ask it

Sign up for a FREE 7-day trial