Supreme Court of New York
883 N.Y.S.2d 458 (2009)
B.S. (plaintiff) and F.B. (defendant) were in a same-sex relationship for over 14 years. The couple lived together, participated in a Buddhist marriage ceremony in New Mexico, and later entered into a civil union in the State of Vermont. Subsequently, the parties had a falling out. B.S. then filed a petition for dissolution of the Buddhist marriage under state law on the grounds of cruel and inhuman treatment, seeking financial support and the exclusive use and occupancy of the house. F.B. moved to dismiss the complaint for lack of subject matter jurisdiction and failure to state a claim, arguing that New York did not recognize the civil union obtained in Vermont and that, pursuant to Vermont law, the civil union was null and void, because the couple had already participated in the Buddhist marriage ceremony.
Rule of Law
Holding and Reasoning (Walker, J.)
What to do next…
Unlock this case brief with a free (no-commitment) trial membership of Quimbee.
You’ll be in good company: Quimbee is one of the most widely used and trusted sites for law students, serving more than 97,000 law students since 2011. Some law schools—such as Yale, Vanderbilt, Berkeley, and the University of Illinois—even subscribe directly to Quimbee for all their law students. Read our student testimonials.
Learn more about Quimbee’s unique (and proven) approach to achieving great grades at law school.
Quimbee is a company hell-bent on one thing: helping you get an “A” in every course you take in law school, so you can graduate at the top of your class and get a high-paying law job. We’re not just a study aid for law students; we’re the study aid for law students. Read more about Quimbee.
Here's why 219,000 law students have relied on our case briefs:
- Written by law professors and practitioners, not other law students. 14,100 briefs, keyed to 189 casebooks. Top-notch customer support.
- The right amount of information, includes the facts, issues, rule of law, holding and reasoning, and any concurrences and dissents.
- Access in your classes, works on your mobile and tablet. Massive library of related video lessons and high quality multiple-choice questions.
- Easy to use, uniform format for every case brief. Written in plain English, not in legalese. Our briefs summarize and simplify; they don’t just repeat the court’s language.