B.V. Bureau Wijsmuller v. United States of America as Owner of the Warship Julius A. Furer
United States District Court for the Southern District of New York
1976 A.M.C. 2514 (1976)
- Written by Mary Katherine Cunningham, JD
Facts
On June 1974, the Julius A. Furer, a warship of the United States Navy, became stranded off the coast of the Netherlands. B.V. Bureau Wijsmuller (Wijsmuller) (plaintiff), a maritime salvage company, directed its salvage vessels to assist the stranded warship. Before assisting the Julius A. Furer, an employee of Wijsmuller obtained the signature of the warship’s captain on a Lloyd’s open form salvage agreement (LOF). The LOF contained arbitration clauses requiring the parties to submit the salvor’s claim for salvage compensation to binding arbitration in London under English law. After the Julius A. Furer grounded, Wijsmuller filed a complaint in the United States District Court for the Southern District of New York under the Public Vessels Act. Wijsmuller also reserved the right to proceed to arbitration under the LOF. Wijsmuller subsequently filed for a motion to compel the United States to proceed to arbitration in London in accordance with the terms of the LOF. In response to the motion to compel arbitration, the government of the United States (the United States) (defendant) argued the court needed to deny the motion to compel arbitration because the United States was not bound by the LOF or the arbitration provisions. The United States, instead, asked for the matter to proceed in the district court pursuant to the Public Vessels Act. Wijsmuller countered that the United States was bound to arbitrate under the agreement signed by the captain of the Julius A. Furer and under 46 U.S.C. § 786.
Rule of Law
Issue
Holding and Reasoning (Haight, J.)
What to do next…
Here's why 815,000 law students have relied on our case briefs:
- Written by law professors and practitioners, not other law students. 46,300 briefs, keyed to 988 casebooks. Top-notch customer support.
- The right amount of information, includes the facts, issues, rule of law, holding and reasoning, and any concurrences and dissents.
- Access in your classes, works on your mobile and tablet. Massive library of related video lessons and high quality multiple-choice questions.
- Easy to use, uniform format for every case brief. Written in plain English, not in legalese. Our briefs summarize and simplify; they don’t just repeat the court’s language.