From our private database of 37,200+ case briefs...
Bacou Dalloz USA v. Continental Polymers, Inc.
United States Court of Appeals for the First Circuit
344 F.3d 22 (2003)
Bacou Dalloz USA (Bacou) (plaintiff) was in negotiations to acquire Howard Leight Industries (HLI), an affiliate of Continental Polymers, Inc. (Continental) (defendant). As part of this larger transaction, in a January 12, 1997, letter, Bacou agreed to purchase from Continental all the polyurethane prepolymer Bacou required for a period of five years. The letter required that the quality of the materials be equal to what HLI used, and that the price of the materials be what was available from other suppliers. The letter ultimately was not included in the documents signed at the closing that consummated Bacou’s purchase of HLI. After closing, Bacou and Continental continued to discuss the specifics regarding the requirements contract, including price, quality, and quantity of the polyurethane prepolymer. Bacou submitted multiple purchase orders to Continental, but Continental did not deliver any materials after the parties could not agree on price, quality, or quantity terms. Bacou sued Continental, seeking a declaratory judgment that it did not have any obligations arising from the January 12 letter, because it was merely an agreement to agree and did not set out all material terms of the agreement. Continental countersued for breach of the letter, asserting that the letter was an enforceable contract and that Bacou breached a duty of good faith in finalizing the quality and quantity of materials it required. The district court granted Bacou summary judgment, finding that the letter contained only illusory promises. Continental appealed.
Rule of Law
Holding and Reasoning (Baldock, J.)
What to do next…
Unlock this case brief with a free (no-commitment) trial membership of Quimbee.
You’ll be in good company: Quimbee is one of the most widely used and trusted sites for law students, serving more than 630,000 law students since 2011. Some law schools—such as Yale, Berkeley, and Northwestern—even subscribe directly to Quimbee for all their law students.Unlock this case briefRead our student testimonials
Learn more about Quimbee’s unique (and proven) approach to achieving great grades at law school.
Quimbee is a company hell-bent on one thing: helping you get an “A” in every course you take in law school, so you can graduate at the top of your class and get a high-paying law job. We’re not just a study aid for law students; we’re the study aid for law students.Learn about our approachRead more about Quimbee
Here's why 630,000 law students have relied on our case briefs:
- Written by law professors and practitioners, not other law students. 37,200 briefs, keyed to 984 casebooks. Top-notch customer support.
- The right amount of information, includes the facts, issues, rule of law, holding and reasoning, and any concurrences and dissents.
- Access in your classes, works on your mobile and tablet. Massive library of related video lessons and high quality multiple-choice questions.
- Easy to use, uniform format for every case brief. Written in plain English, not in legalese. Our briefs summarize and simplify; they don’t just repeat the court’s language.