Quimbee logo
DMCA.com Protection Status

Bagford v. Ephraim City

904 P.2d 1095 (1995)

Case BriefRelatedOptions
From our private database of 32,400+ case briefs...

Bagford v. Ephraim City

Utah Supreme Court

904 P.2d 1095 (1995)

Facts

John M. Bagford and Fae H. Bagford (plaintiffs) owned and operated a garbage collection and disposal business called the Sanpete Valley Disposal and Landfill in Sanpete County, Utah. The Bagfords provided residential and commercial services in Ephraim City (city) (defendant), other municipalities in the county, and unincorporated areas in the county. The Bagfords used informal, oral agreements to provide customers services on a weekly basis. In 1989, the city accepted bids for garbage-collection services to bring the city into compliance with federal and state health and safety regulations. The Bagfords did not win the bid for the residential service contract. In October 1989, the city enacted Ordinance 10-412 (ordinance), which charged residential electrical service rates to all residences for garbage-collection services arranged by the city. Residents were required to pay for the garbage-collection services whether they used the services or not. Subsequently, the Bagfords’ 176 residential customers terminated their contracts with the Bagfords. The Bagfords maintained their 32 commercial customers in the city. The Bagfords brought an inverse-condemnation suit against the city, alleging that their oral agreements with city customers were protectable property interests and that they were entitled to damages because the ordinance constituted a taking in violation of Article 1, § 22 of the Utah Constitution. The district court found for the city, concluding that the Bagfords did not have a protectable property interest and were not prohibited from competitive business.

Rule of Law

Issue

Holding and Reasoning (Stewart, J.)

What to do next…

  1. Unlock this case brief with a free (no-commitment) trial membership of Quimbee.

    You’ll be in good company: Quimbee is one of the most widely used and trusted sites for law students, serving more than 587,000 law students since 2011. Some law schools—such as Yale, Berkeley, and Northwestern—even subscribe directly to Quimbee for all their law students.

    Unlock this case briefRead our student testimonials
  2. Learn more about Quimbee’s unique (and proven) approach to achieving great grades at law school.

    Quimbee is a company hell-bent on one thing: helping you get an “A” in every course you take in law school, so you can graduate at the top of your class and get a high-paying law job. We’re not just a study aid for law students; we’re the study aid for law students.

    Learn about our approachRead more about Quimbee

Here's why 587,000 law students have relied on our case briefs:

  • Written by law professors and practitioners, not other law students. 32,400 briefs, keyed to 984 casebooks. Top-notch customer support.
  • The right amount of information, includes the facts, issues, rule of law, holding and reasoning, and any concurrences and dissents.
  • Access in your classes, works on your mobile and tablet. Massive library of related video lessons and high quality multiple-choice questions.
  • Easy to use, uniform format for every case brief. Written in plain English, not in legalese. Our briefs summarize and simplify; they don’t just repeat the court’s language.

Access this case brief for FREE

With a 7-day free trial membership
Here's why 587,000 law students have relied on our case briefs:
  • Reliable - written by law professors and practitioners, not other law students
  • The right length and amount of information - includes the facts, issue, rule of law, holding and reasoning, and any concurrences and dissents
  • Access in your class - works on your mobile and tablet
  • 32,400 briefs - keyed to 984 casebooks
  • Uniform format for every case brief
  • Written in plain English - not in legalese and not just repeating the court's language
  • Massive library of related video lessons - and practice questions
  • Top-notch customer support

Access this case brief for FREE

With a 7-day free trial membership