From our private database of 35,600+ case briefs...
Bailey v. Algonquin Gas Transmission Co.
Supreme Court of Rhode Island
788 A.2d 478 (2002)
Robert Bailey and others (plaintiffs) sued Maguire Group, Architects, Engineers, Planners, Ltd. (Maguire) (defendant), alleging that they had suffered personal injuries as a result of Maguire’s negligence. Maguire was represented by attorney John Coffey Jr. The plaintiffs served upon Coffey a request to Maguire for production of documents. Coffey never informed Maguire about the request, and never responded to the request. Coffey also never responded to follow-up motions to compel Maguire to produce the requested documents. Coffey served as legal counsel for Maguire on other matters and routinely met with Maguire representatives to provide case updates. However, Coffey advised Maguire that nothing was happening in the negligence case. As a result of the failure to respond to the request for production and the subsequent motions, a default judgment was entered against Maguire for damages. Upon learning of Coffey’s mishandling of the case, Maguire hired a new attorney to file a motion to vacate the default judgment. The motion to vacate was based on Superior Court Rules of Civil Procedure (Rules) 60(b)(1) and (6), which granted a party relief from final judgment on the basis of their conduct or their attorney’s conduct for reasons such as excusable neglect. Maguire argued that Coffey’s alcohol abuse during his representation caused him to improperly handle the case. The trial court denied the motion to vacate on the basis that Coffey’s failure to respond did not constitute excusable neglect, but rather resulted from unexplained or willful conduct. Maguire appealed.
Rule of Law
Holding and Reasoning (Flanders, J.)
What to do next…
Unlock this case brief with a free (no-commitment) trial membership of Quimbee.
You’ll be in good company: Quimbee is one of the most widely used and trusted sites for law students, serving more than 618,000 law students since 2011. Some law schools—such as Yale, Berkeley, and Northwestern—even subscribe directly to Quimbee for all their law students.Unlock this case briefRead our student testimonials
Learn more about Quimbee’s unique (and proven) approach to achieving great grades at law school.
Quimbee is a company hell-bent on one thing: helping you get an “A” in every course you take in law school, so you can graduate at the top of your class and get a high-paying law job. We’re not just a study aid for law students; we’re the study aid for law students.Learn about our approachRead more about Quimbee
Here's why 618,000 law students have relied on our case briefs:
- Written by law professors and practitioners, not other law students. 35,600 briefs, keyed to 984 casebooks. Top-notch customer support.
- The right amount of information, includes the facts, issues, rule of law, holding and reasoning, and any concurrences and dissents.
- Access in your classes, works on your mobile and tablet. Massive library of related video lessons and high quality multiple-choice questions.
- Easy to use, uniform format for every case brief. Written in plain English, not in legalese. Our briefs summarize and simplify; they don’t just repeat the court’s language.