Bailey v. State of Alabama
United States Supreme Court
219 U.S. 219 (1911)
- Written by Craig Conway, LLM
Facts
Bailey (defendant) entered into a written contract with the Riverside Company (Riverside) in which he agreed to work as a farm hand for $12 per month for a term of one year. Bailey was given $15 in cash as consideration. However, Bailey stopped working after approximately one month and refused to return the $15 to Riverside. Bailey was subsequently charged with a crime. At his criminal trial, the court charged the jury that “the refusal of any person who enters into such contract to perform such act or service, or refund such money, or pay for such property, without just cause, shall be prima facie evidence of the intent to injure his employer, or to defraud him.” Bailey’s request for a different jury instruction was refused. He was found guilty and assessed damages of $15 and a fine of $30. The court further held that if Bailey refused or was unable to pay the fine he would be sentenced to 136 days of hard labor. Bailey appealed, and the Alabama Supreme Court affirmed the conviction. The US Supreme Court granted certiorari to review.
Rule of Law
Issue
Holding and Reasoning (Hughes, J.)
Dissent (Holmes, J.)
What to do next…
Here's why 816,000 law students have relied on our case briefs:
- Written by law professors and practitioners, not other law students. 46,300 briefs, keyed to 988 casebooks. Top-notch customer support.
- The right amount of information, includes the facts, issues, rule of law, holding and reasoning, and any concurrences and dissents.
- Access in your classes, works on your mobile and tablet. Massive library of related video lessons and high quality multiple-choice questions.
- Easy to use, uniform format for every case brief. Written in plain English, not in legalese. Our briefs summarize and simplify; they don’t just repeat the court’s language.
