Bailey v. West
Rhode Island Supreme Court
105 R.I. 61, 249 A.2d 414 (1969)
- Written by Megan Petersen, JD
Facts
Richard West (defendant) purchased a racehorse that turned out to be lame. West told his trainer to return the horse. The seller did not accept the returned horse, and the horse was shipped instead to the farm of Howard Bailey (plaintiff). Upon the horse’s arrival, Bailey was aware that there was a dispute regarding the horse’s owner. Nevertheless, Bailey boarded and took care of the horse. Bailey sent monthly bills to West for the maintenance and care of the horse. As soon as he received the first bill, West replied that he did not own the horse and would not pay for any boarding. Bailey brought suit against West to recover for his services. Bailey claimed both a contract implied in fact and a quasi-contract. The trial court found a contract implied in fact and held West liable to Bailey for boarding services, but only for the period until Bailey received West’s notice that West did not own the horse. Both parties appealed.
Rule of Law
Issue
Holding and Reasoning (Paolino, J.)
What to do next…
Here's why 820,000 law students have relied on our case briefs:
- Written by law professors and practitioners, not other law students. 46,300 briefs, keyed to 988 casebooks. Top-notch customer support.
- The right amount of information, includes the facts, issues, rule of law, holding and reasoning, and any concurrences and dissents.
- Access in your classes, works on your mobile and tablet. Massive library of related video lessons and high quality multiple-choice questions.
- Easy to use, uniform format for every case brief. Written in plain English, not in legalese. Our briefs summarize and simplify; they don’t just repeat the court’s language.