Court of Appeals of Alaska
905 P.2d 479 (1996)
Donald Baker (defendant) and his friends, John Stanfill and Jason Frazier, devised a plan to rob a pizza deliveryman. After calling and directing a restaurant to deliver pizzas to a fake address, the three robbers hid and waited. When the deliveryman arrived, he could not find the person who had placed the order, and turned around to leave. One of the robbers emerged and repeatedly struck the deliveryman. The deliveryman dropped the pizzas, which were picked up by two of the robbers, and all three robbers fled. The deliveryman could not identify the robber who had hit him. All three robbers were arrested. At Baker’s trial, the prosecution indicated that Baker was a principal to the robbery and that the theory of the case was that Baker was the robber who had hit the deliveryman. The prosecution stated that the jury could convict Baker even if the jury did not believe that Baker had hit the deliveryman, as long as the jury did believe that Baker was one of the three robbers. At the end of the trial, the judge instructed the jury on accomplice liability. Baker was convicted. Baker appealed to the Court of Appeals of Alaska, arguing that the trial court erred in instructing the jury on accomplice liability because this allowed Baker to be convicted as an accessory to the crime even though the state’s theory of the case was that he was a principal. Additionally, Baker argued that the indictment charging him with robbery did not put him on sufficient notice that he could be convicted as either a principal or an accessory to the robbery.
Rule of Law
Holding and Reasoning (Mannheimer, J.)
What to do next…
Unlock this case brief with a free (no-commitment) trial membership of Quimbee.
You’ll be in good company: Quimbee is one of the most widely used and trusted sites for law students, serving more than 97,000 law students since 2011. Some law schools—such as Yale, Vanderbilt, Berkeley, and the University of Illinois—even subscribe directly to Quimbee for all their law students. Read our student testimonials.
Learn more about Quimbee’s unique (and proven) approach to achieving great grades at law school.
Quimbee is a company hell-bent on one thing: helping you get an “A” in every course you take in law school, so you can graduate at the top of your class and get a high-paying law job. We’re not just a study aid for law students; we’re the study aid for law students. Read more about Quimbee.
Here's why 220,000 law students have relied on our case briefs:
- Written by law professors and practitioners, not other law students. 14,100 briefs, keyed to 189 casebooks. Top-notch customer support.
- The right amount of information, includes the facts, issues, rule of law, holding and reasoning, and any concurrences and dissents.
- Access in your classes, works on your mobile and tablet. Massive library of related video lessons and high quality multiple-choice questions.
- Easy to use, uniform format for every case brief. Written in plain English, not in legalese. Our briefs summarize and simplify; they don’t just repeat the court’s language.