Logourl black
From our private database of 14,100+ case briefs...

Baker v. Commissioner

United States Tax Court
118 T.C. 452 (2002)


Facts

Warren Baker (plaintiff) operated the Warren L. Baker Insurance Agency (agency), which sold policies for State Farm Insurance Companies (State Farm). Baker’s contract with State Farm indicated that he was an independent contractor and was required to work with State Farm exclusively. The contract also stated that the agency’s business materials that were provided by State Farm, as well as the agency’s customer lists and policyholder materials, were State Farm’s exclusive property. Baker developed the agency’s customer base and policyholder materials, selected the office location, and hired and trained the employees. There was no employment contract between Baker and the agency’s employees. When Baker closed the agency, he passed on his customer base, office phone number, and sales techniques to a successor State Farm agent. Baker was entitled to a termination payment from State Farm, provided that he delivered all of the agency materials to State Farm and honored a covenant not to compete with State Farm for one year. On Baker’s federal tax returns, he reported the termination payment from State Farm as capital gain. The federal tax commissioner (commissioner) (defendant) issued a deficiency notice against Baker, determining that the termination payment constituted ordinary income. Baker petitioned the United States Tax Court for a redetermination.

Rule of Law

The rule of law is the black letter law upon which the court rested its decision.

To access this section, please start your free trial or log in.

Issue

The issue section includes the dispositive legal issue in the case phrased as a question.

To access this section, please start your free trial or log in.

Holding and Reasoning (Panuthos, J.)

The holding and reasoning section includes:

  • A "yes" or "no" answer to the question framed in the issue section;
  • A summary of the majority or plurality opinion, using the CREAC method; and
  • The procedural disposition (e.g. reversed and remanded, affirmed, etc.).

To access this section, please start your free trial or log in.

What to do next…

  1. Unlock this case brief with a free (no-commitment) trial membership of Quimbee.

    You’ll be in good company: Quimbee is one of the most widely used and trusted sites for law students, serving more than 97,000 law students since 2011. Some law schools—such as Yale, Vanderbilt, Berkeley, and the University of Illinois—even subscribe directly to Quimbee for all their law students. Read our student testimonials.

  2. Learn more about Quimbee’s unique (and proven) approach to achieving great grades at law school.

    Quimbee is a company hell-bent on one thing: helping you get an “A” in every course you take in law school, so you can graduate at the top of your class and get a high-paying law job. We’re not just a study aid for law students; we’re the study aid for law students. Read more about Quimbee.

Here's why 221,000 law students have relied on our case briefs:

  • Written by law professors and practitioners, not other law students. 14,100 briefs, keyed to 189 casebooks. Top-notch customer support.
  • The right amount of information, includes the facts, issues, rule of law, holding and reasoning, and any concurrences and dissents.
  • Access in your classes, works on your mobile and tablet. Massive library of related video lessons and high quality multiple-choice questions.
  • Easy to use, uniform format for every case brief. Written in plain English, not in legalese. Our briefs summarize and simplify; they don’t just repeat the court’s language.