Baker v. Commonwealth

225 Va. 192, 300 S.E.2d 788 (1983)

From our private database of 46,300+ case briefs, written and edited by humans—never with AI.

Baker v. Commonwealth

Virginia Supreme Court
225 Va. 192, 300 S.E.2d 788 (1983)

RW

Facts

Robert Lee Baker (defendant) drove his truck to a car dealership and arranged with the dealer to test drive a Jeep on the dealer's lot. Baker represented that he owned the truck and would leave it with the dealer as security for the Jeep's return. In fact, Baker had stolen the truck. Baker left the truck with the dealer and drove off in the Jeep. The dealer retained the Jeep's title documents. Baker never returned the Jeep to the dealer. The Commonwealth of Virginia (plaintiff) indicted Baker for larceny by false pretenses. The Commonwealth requested a jury instruction that dealt only with Baker's possession of the Jeep and not with the Jeep's title. The jury was so instructed, and returned a guilty verdict. Baker appealed to the Supreme Court of Virginia.

Rule of Law

Issue

Holding and Reasoning (Stephenson, J.)

What to do next…

  1. Unlock this case brief with a free (no-commitment) trial membership of Quimbee.

    You’ll be in good company: Quimbee is one of the most widely used and trusted sites for law students, serving more than 803,000 law students since 2011. Some law schools—such as Yale, Berkeley, and Northwestern—even subscribe directly to Quimbee for all their law students.

    Unlock this case briefRead our student testimonials
  2. Learn more about Quimbee’s unique (and proven) approach to achieving great grades at law school.

    Quimbee is a company hell-bent on one thing: helping you get an “A” in every course you take in law school, so you can graduate at the top of your class and get a high-paying law job. We’re not just a study aid for law students; we’re the study aid for law students.

    Learn about our approachRead more about Quimbee

Here's why 803,000 law students have relied on our case briefs:

  • Written by law professors and practitioners, not other law students. 46,300 briefs, keyed to 988 casebooks. Top-notch customer support.
  • The right amount of information, includes the facts, issues, rule of law, holding and reasoning, and any concurrences and dissents.
  • Access in your classes, works on your mobile and tablet. Massive library of related video lessons and high quality multiple-choice questions.
  • Easy to use, uniform format for every case brief. Written in plain English, not in legalese. Our briefs summarize and simplify; they don’t just repeat the court’s language.

Access this case brief for FREE

With a 7-day free trial membership
Here's why 803,000 law students have relied on our case briefs:
  • Reliable - written by law professors and practitioners, not other law students
  • The right length and amount of information - includes the facts, issue, rule of law, holding and reasoning, and any concurrences and dissents
  • Access in your class - works on your mobile and tablet
  • 46,300 briefs - keyed to 988 casebooks
  • Uniform format for every case brief
  • Written in plain English - not in legalese and not just repeating the court's language
  • Massive library of related video lessons - and practice questions
  • Top-notch customer support

Access this case brief for FREE

With a 7-day free trial membership