Logourl black
From our private database of 14,100+ case briefs...

Baker v. Howard County Hunt

Court of Appeals of Maryland
188 A. 223 (1936)


Facts

Dr. Laurence H. Baker (plaintiff) owned a farm on which he lived with his wife (plaintiff), raised animals that included chickens, experimented with the diet of rabbits, gardened, and sought to create a refuge for birds and small animals. An association named Howard County Hunt (Howard) (defendant) was formed in 1930 to hunt foxes. Howard occupied a farm near Baker. Baker first noticed hunters and dogs on his farm in 1931. In January 1933, the dogs attacked and bit Baker’s wife. Howard’s president wrote Baker a letter expressing concern for Baker’s wife. However, the dogs subsequently trampled Baker’s crops, broke hot frames, and disturbed his animals. Baker’s wife left the farm. In February 1936, Baker shot three of the dogs after finding them surrounded by dead and frightened chickens in his chicken yard. In March 1936, the Bakers sued Howard, its agents, and its employees (defendants) to enjoin them and their dogs from hunting on the property or otherwise interfering with the peaceful possession of the property. The trial court dismissed the case. Baker appealed. Howard claimed that Baker was not entitled to an injunction because his hands were unclean due to his shooting of the dogs, and because there was a remedy at law for damages.

Rule of Law

The rule of law is the black letter law upon which the court rested its decision.

To access this section, please start your free trial or log in.

Issue

The issue section includes the dispositive legal issue in the case phrased as a question.

To access this section, please start your free trial or log in.

Holding and Reasoning (Offutt, J.)

The holding and reasoning section includes:

  • A "yes" or "no" answer to the question framed in the issue section;
  • A summary of the majority or plurality opinion, using the CREAC method; and
  • The procedural disposition (e.g. reversed and remanded, affirmed, etc.).

To access this section, please start your free trial or log in.

What to do next…

  1. Unlock this case brief with a free (no-commitment) trial membership of Quimbee.

    You’ll be in good company: Quimbee is one of the most widely used and trusted sites for law students, serving more than 97,000 law students since 2011. Some law schools—such as Yale, Vanderbilt, Berkeley, and the University of Illinois—even subscribe directly to Quimbee for all their law students. Read our student testimonials.

  2. Learn more about Quimbee’s unique (and proven) approach to achieving great grades at law school.

    Quimbee is a company hell-bent on one thing: helping you get an “A” in every course you take in law school, so you can graduate at the top of your class and get a high-paying law job. We’re not just a study aid for law students; we’re the study aid for law students. Read more about Quimbee.

Here's why 221,000 law students have relied on our case briefs:

  • Written by law professors and practitioners, not other law students. 14,100 briefs, keyed to 189 casebooks. Top-notch customer support.
  • The right amount of information, includes the facts, issues, rule of law, holding and reasoning, and any concurrences and dissents.
  • Access in your classes, works on your mobile and tablet. Massive library of related video lessons and high quality multiple-choice questions.
  • Easy to use, uniform format for every case brief. Written in plain English, not in legalese. Our briefs summarize and simplify; they don’t just repeat the court’s language.