Baker v. Ocean Systems
United States Court of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit
454 F.2d 379 (1972)
- Written by Daniel Clark, JD
Facts
Thomas Baker (plaintiff) worked on a barge owned and operated by Ocean Systems, Inc. (defendant). Baker worked as part of a crew on a diving project. Ocean Systems paid Baker until the date the project was completed. After that date, Baker had the option to report for more work at Ocean System’s on-shore shop, but he was not obligated to do so. Baker also told Ocean Systems that he would be on call to report without notice for any work on a vessel that could arise after the project was completed. However, Baker was not under a binding obligation to report in the event that he was called. The day after completion of the diving project, Baker suffered injuries from an unprovoked attack. Baker sued Ocean Systems for maintenance and cure. The district court ruled in favor of Ocean Systems, finding that Baker was not in the service of his vessel when he was injured. Baker appealed.
Rule of Law
Issue
Holding and Reasoning (Ainsworth, J.)
What to do next…
Here's why 805,000 law students have relied on our case briefs:
- Written by law professors and practitioners, not other law students. 46,300 briefs, keyed to 988 casebooks. Top-notch customer support.
- The right amount of information, includes the facts, issues, rule of law, holding and reasoning, and any concurrences and dissents.
- Access in your classes, works on your mobile and tablet. Massive library of related video lessons and high quality multiple-choice questions.
- Easy to use, uniform format for every case brief. Written in plain English, not in legalese. Our briefs summarize and simplify; they don’t just repeat the court’s language.
