Baker v. Ore-Ida Foods, Inc.

513 P.2d 627 (1973)

From our private database of 46,300+ case briefs, written and edited by humans—never with AI.

Baker v. Ore-Ida Foods, Inc.

Idaho Supreme Court
513 P.2d 627 (1973)

  • Written by Rose VanHofwegen, JD

Facts

Idaho farmers developed multiple wells to pump irrigation water from a common aquifer recharged primarily by precipitation. In the 1960s, the farmers “mined” the aquifer by drawing water faster than its natural recharge rate, dropping the water level 20 feet annually. Simon Baker and other farmers with senior water rights (plaintiffs) sued to stop Ore-Ida Foods, Inc., and others with junior water rights (defendants) from pumping water until the senior wells could resume normal production. The trial court calculated the natural recharge rate, found just four senior wells could pump that entire amount of water, enjoined pumping from all other wells, and assigned further administration of its decree to the Idaho Department of Water Administration. The junior rights holders appealed, arguing they had correlative rights to a mutual proportional share of water in the aquifer and that senior appropriators could enjoin junior appropriators from pumping water only if it exceeded reasonable pumping levels.

Rule of Law

Issue

Holding and Reasoning (Shepard, J.)

What to do next…

  1. Unlock this case brief with a free (no-commitment) trial membership of Quimbee.

    You’ll be in good company: Quimbee is one of the most widely used and trusted sites for law students, serving more than 815,000 law students since 2011. Some law schools even subscribe directly to Quimbee for all their law students.

  2. Learn more about Quimbee’s unique (and proven) approach to achieving great grades at law school.

    Quimbee is a company hell-bent on one thing: helping you get an “A” in every course you take in law school, so you can graduate at the top of your class and get a high-paying law job. We’re not just a study aid for law students; we’re the study aid for law students.

Here's why 815,000 law students have relied on our case briefs:

  • Written by law professors and practitioners, not other law students. 46,300 briefs, keyed to 988 casebooks. Top-notch customer support.
  • The right amount of information, includes the facts, issues, rule of law, holding and reasoning, and any concurrences and dissents.
  • Access in your classes, works on your mobile and tablet. Massive library of related video lessons and high quality multiple-choice questions.
  • Easy to use, uniform format for every case brief. Written in plain English, not in legalese. Our briefs summarize and simplify; they don’t just repeat the court’s language.

Access this case brief for FREE

With a 7-day free trial membership
Here's why 815,000 law students have relied on our case briefs:
  • Reliable - written by law professors and practitioners, not other law students
  • The right length and amount of information - includes the facts, issue, rule of law, holding and reasoning, and any concurrences and dissents
  • Access in your class - works on your mobile and tablet
  • 46,300 briefs - keyed to 988 casebooks
  • Uniform format for every case brief
  • Written in plain English - not in legalese and not just repeating the court's language
  • Massive library of related video lessons - and practice questions
  • Top-notch customer support

Access this case brief for FREE

With a 7-day free trial membership