Baker v. Smiscik
United States District Court for the Eastern District of Michigan
49 F. Supp. 3d 489 (2014)
- Written by Angela Patrick, JD
Facts
James Baker (plaintiff) walked into a donut shop while openly carrying a rifle and a handgun. The shop’s manager called 911, and several police officers (defendants) responded. One officer asked Baker why he had the firearms, and Baker stated that he was openly carrying them. The officers temporarily disarmed Baker while they questioned him further. Baker refused to provide identification, and one officer pulled a wallet from Baker’s jacket to obtain Baker’s identification. After the police officers confirmed that the manager wanted Baker to leave, they escorted Baker to his car, placed his weapons in the trunk, and watched him depart. The encounter lasted approximately 30 minutes. Baker sued the officers, alleging that they had violated his civil rights under the Second and Fourth Amendments to the United States Constitution. The officers raised a qualified-immunity defense and moved to dismiss the lawsuit.
Rule of Law
Issue
Holding and Reasoning (Goldsmith, J.)
What to do next…
Here's why 804,000 law students have relied on our case briefs:
- Written by law professors and practitioners, not other law students. 46,300 briefs, keyed to 988 casebooks. Top-notch customer support.
- The right amount of information, includes the facts, issues, rule of law, holding and reasoning, and any concurrences and dissents.
- Access in your classes, works on your mobile and tablet. Massive library of related video lessons and high quality multiple-choice questions.
- Easy to use, uniform format for every case brief. Written in plain English, not in legalese. Our briefs summarize and simplify; they don’t just repeat the court’s language.