Baker v. Weedon

262 So.2d 641 (1972)

From our private database of 46,200+ case briefs, written and edited by humans—never with AI.

Baker v. Weedon

Mississippi Supreme Court
262 So.2d 641 (1972)

Play video

Facts

John Weedon purchased a farm. Ten years later, John married Anna (plaintiff), who became Anna Weedon. Anna worked the farm with John for approximately 20 years before John died. John’s will gave Anna a life estate in the farm. This life estate meant Anna had the legal right to use and profit from the farm during her life, but her right to the farm would end at her death. Anna eventually became too elderly to work the farm and rented it out. The rental income was not enough for Anna to live on, and she had few other resources. Anna filed a lawsuit asking the chancery court for a judicial sale of the farm. The sale proceeds would go into a trust and generate more income than Anna had been receiving from renting the farm. Anna argued that a judicial sale was justified because continuing to use the property as farmland was so inefficient that it qualified as economic waste. At that time, John had three living grandchildren from a prior marriage: Henry Baker, Sarah Lyman, and Louise Heck (defendants). Under the terms of John’s will, these three grandchildren were the remaindermen who would inherit the farm after Anna’s death. The grandchildren opposed the sale, arguing the farm was not deteriorating or being wasted. To the contrary, the farm was about to appreciate rapidly. Due to significant new development in the area, in four years the farm’s market value would likely double from around $168,000 to $336,000. A judicial sale now would mean the grandchildren would lose this appreciation. The chancery court found that using the land as a farm was economic waste and ordered a judicial sale. The grandchildren appealed to the Mississippi Supreme Court.

Rule of Law

Issue

Holding and Reasoning (Patterson, J.)

What to do next…

  1. Unlock this case brief with a free (no-commitment) trial membership of Quimbee.

    You’ll be in good company: Quimbee is one of the most widely used and trusted sites for law students, serving more than 796,000 law students since 2011. Some law schools—such as Yale, Berkeley, and Northwestern—even subscribe directly to Quimbee for all their law students.

    Unlock this case briefRead our student testimonials
  2. Learn more about Quimbee’s unique (and proven) approach to achieving great grades at law school.

    Quimbee is a company hell-bent on one thing: helping you get an “A” in every course you take in law school, so you can graduate at the top of your class and get a high-paying law job. We’re not just a study aid for law students; we’re the study aid for law students.

    Learn about our approachRead more about Quimbee

Here's why 796,000 law students have relied on our case briefs:

  • Written by law professors and practitioners, not other law students. 46,200 briefs, keyed to 988 casebooks. Top-notch customer support.
  • The right amount of information, includes the facts, issues, rule of law, holding and reasoning, and any concurrences and dissents.
  • Access in your classes, works on your mobile and tablet. Massive library of related video lessons and high quality multiple-choice questions.
  • Easy to use, uniform format for every case brief. Written in plain English, not in legalese. Our briefs summarize and simplify; they don’t just repeat the court’s language.

Access this case brief for FREE

With a 7-day free trial membership
Here's why 796,000 law students have relied on our case briefs:
  • Reliable - written by law professors and practitioners, not other law students
  • The right length and amount of information - includes the facts, issue, rule of law, holding and reasoning, and any concurrences and dissents
  • Access in your class - works on your mobile and tablet
  • 46,200 briefs - keyed to 988 casebooks
  • Uniform format for every case brief
  • Written in plain English - not in legalese and not just repeating the court's language
  • Massive library of related video lessons - and practice questions
  • Top-notch customer support

Access this case brief for FREE

With a 7-day free trial membership