Baker v. Weedon
Mississippi Supreme Court
262 So.2d 641 (1972)
- Written by Angela Patrick, JD
Facts
John Weedon purchased a farm. Ten years later, John married Anna (plaintiff), who became Anna Weedon. Anna worked the farm with John for approximately 20 years before John died. John’s will gave Anna a life estate in the farm. This life estate meant Anna had the legal right to use and profit from the farm during her life, but her right to the farm would end at her death. Anna eventually became too elderly to work the farm and rented it out. The rental income was not enough for Anna to live on, and she had few other resources. Anna filed a lawsuit asking the chancery court for a judicial sale of the farm. The sale proceeds would go into a trust and generate more income than Anna had been receiving from renting the farm. Anna argued that a judicial sale was justified because continuing to use the property as farmland was so inefficient that it qualified as economic waste. At that time, John had three living grandchildren from a prior marriage: Henry Baker, Sarah Lyman, and Louise Heck (defendants). Under the terms of John’s will, these three grandchildren were the remaindermen who would inherit the farm after Anna’s death. The grandchildren opposed the sale, arguing the farm was not deteriorating or being wasted. To the contrary, the farm was about to appreciate rapidly. Due to significant new development in the area, in four years the farm’s market value would likely double from around $168,000 to $336,000. A judicial sale now would mean the grandchildren would lose this appreciation. The chancery court found that using the land as a farm was economic waste and ordered a judicial sale. The grandchildren appealed to the Mississippi Supreme Court.
Rule of Law
Issue
Holding and Reasoning (Patterson, J.)
What to do next…
Here's why 796,000 law students have relied on our case briefs:
- Written by law professors and practitioners, not other law students. 46,200 briefs, keyed to 988 casebooks. Top-notch customer support.
- The right amount of information, includes the facts, issues, rule of law, holding and reasoning, and any concurrences and dissents.
- Access in your classes, works on your mobile and tablet. Massive library of related video lessons and high quality multiple-choice questions.
- Easy to use, uniform format for every case brief. Written in plain English, not in legalese. Our briefs summarize and simplify; they don’t just repeat the court’s language.