Balen v. Holland America Line
United States Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit
583 F.3d 647, 2009 AMC 2561 (2009)
- Written by Carolyn Strutton, JD
Facts
Romeo Balen (plaintiff) worked as a beverage attendant on a cruise ship owned by Holland America Line (HAL) (defendant). Balen was a citizen of the Philippines, and Balen’s employment with HAL was subject to a standard Philippines-government-approved contract for seamen that included a provision requiring disputes to be settled by arbitration. Balen’s employment required participation in the HAL gratuity plan, which provided a guaranteed minimum gratuity payment to HAL employees but also required employees to reimburse HAL for travel expenses. Balen was discharged from his employment with HAL after he failed to pay the travel expenses he owed to HAL under the gratuity plan. Balen sued HAL in federal district court for breach of contract and violation of the Wage Act. HAL moved to dismiss Balen’s claim and compel arbitration of the issue under the terms of the employment contract. The district court granted the motion. Balen appealed.
Rule of Law
Issue
Holding and Reasoning (Smith, J.)
What to do next…
Here's why 806,000 law students have relied on our case briefs:
- Written by law professors and practitioners, not other law students. 46,300 briefs, keyed to 988 casebooks. Top-notch customer support.
- The right amount of information, includes the facts, issues, rule of law, holding and reasoning, and any concurrences and dissents.
- Access in your classes, works on your mobile and tablet. Massive library of related video lessons and high quality multiple-choice questions.
- Easy to use, uniform format for every case brief. Written in plain English, not in legalese. Our briefs summarize and simplify; they don’t just repeat the court’s language.