Ballard v. Pritchard
Florida District Court of Appeal
332 So. 3d 570 (2021)
- Written by Tammy Boggs, JD
Facts
In her will, Juanita Carter devised a life estate in her homestead to her spouse, Pinkney Carter, with the remainder to go to one of her adult sons, Ronald Williams (plaintiff), in fee simple. Juanita did not devise any real property to her other son, Robert Williams. In 2002, Juanita died. In 2017, Robert died, and Lindsay Ballard (defendant) was his sole heir. In 2019, Pinkney died. In 2020, Ronald sought to administer Juanita’s estate. Ballard petitioned for a determination of homestead status and alleged that Juanita’s devise in her will was invalid. Ballard argued that the invalidity of the devise caused the homestead to pass according to the laws of intestacy, under which Pinkney obtained a life estate and Ronald and Robert obtained the remainder interest, in equal shares. For his part, Ronald argued in favor of upholding Juanita’s will or that any objection to the validity of the will had been waived though Pinkney’s enjoyment of a life estate in the homestead or the passage of time without any asserted objections. The trial court entered an order effectively upholding Juanita’s will, and Ballard appealed. Subsequently, Ronald died, and his interest in the litigation was transferred to his children, including Kristen Pritchard (plaintiff). On appeal, it was uncontested that the property at issue was Juanita’s homestead. Pritchard maintained that certain equitable principles, like waiver by estoppel, could be considered to uphold Juanita’s intention of leaving the remainder interest in the homestead to Ronald alone.
Rule of Law
Issue
Holding and Reasoning (Silberman, J.)
What to do next…
Here's why 820,000 law students have relied on our case briefs:
- Written by law professors and practitioners, not other law students. 46,300 briefs, keyed to 989 casebooks. Top-notch customer support.
- The right amount of information, includes the facts, issues, rule of law, holding and reasoning, and any concurrences and dissents.
- Access in your classes, works on your mobile and tablet. Massive library of related video lessons and high quality multiple-choice questions.
- Easy to use, uniform format for every case brief. Written in plain English, not in legalese. Our briefs summarize and simplify; they don’t just repeat the court’s language.