Logourl black
From our private database of 13,800+ case briefs...

Baltimore City Department of Social Services. v. Bouknight

United States Supreme Court
 493 U.S. 549 (1990)


Facts

Bouknight (defendant) was suspected of abusing her infant son, Maurice. Baltimore City Department of Social Services (BCDSS, defendant) got a court order to take Maurice from Bouknight’s care. Bouknight was later given temporary custody of Maurice. Later, the court held that Maurice was a child in need of assistance and asserted jurisdiction over him. BCDSS allowed Bouknight to retain custody of Maurice subject to several conditions laid out in a supervision order that required Bouknight to cooperate with BCDSS. When Bouknight did not cooperate with BCDSS and violated other conditions of the supervision order, the court granted BCDSS’s petition to remove Maurice from her custody. After Bouknight refused to produce Maurice, the court held her in contempt. Bouknight argued that the contempt order violated the Fifth Amendment’s protection against self-incrimination. The court rejected this argument and stated that she could purge herself of the contempt order by producing Maurice, and that the contempt order was issued because she violated the court’s order to produce Maurice and not because she refused to testify. The court of appeals vacated the lower court’s order upholding the contempt order. The court held that the contempt order violated the Fifth Amendment by forcing her to admit, by producing Maurice, that she had ongoing control over him under circumstances where she would likely be prosecuted. The Supreme Court granted certiorari on constitutional grounds.

Rule of Law

The rule of law is the black letter law upon which the court rested its decision. To access this section, start your 7-day free trial of Quimbee for Law Students.

Issue

The issue section includes the dispositive legal issue in the case phrased as a question. To access this section, start your 7-day free trial of Quimbee for Law Students.

Holding and Reasoning (O’Connor, J.)

The holding and reasoning section includes:

  • A “yes” or “no” answer to the question framed in the issue section;
  • A summary of the majority or plurality opinion, using the CREAC method; and
  • The procedural disposition (e.g. reversed and remanded, affirmed, etc.).

To access this section, start your 7-day free trial of Quimbee for Law Students.

Dissent (Marshall, J.)

The dissent section is for members only and includes a summary of the dissenting judge or justice’s opinion. To access this section, start your 7-day free trial of Quimbee for Law Students.

What to do next…

  1. Unlock this case brief with a free (no-commitment) trial membership of Quimbee.

    You’ll be in good company: Quimbee is one of the most widely used and trusted sites for law students, serving more than 97,000 law students since 2011. Some law schools—such as Yale, Vanderbilt, Berkeley, and the University of Illinois—even subscribe directly to Quimbee for all their law students. Read our student testimonials.

  2. Learn more about Quimbee’s unique (and proven) approach to achieving great grades at law school.

    Quimbee is a company hell-bent on one thing: helping you get an “A” in every course you take in law school, so you can graduate at the top of your class and get a high-paying law job. We’re not just a study aid for law students; we’re the study aid for law students. Read more about Quimbee.

Here's why 170,000 law students have relied on our case briefs:

  • Written by law professors and practitioners, not other law students. 13,800 briefs, keyed to 187 casebooks. Top-notch customer support.
  • The right amount of information, includes the facts, issues, rule of law, holding and reasoning, and any concurrences and dissents.
  • Access in your classes, works on your mobile and tablet. Massive library of related video lessons and high quality multiple-choice questions.
  • Easy to use, uniform format for every case brief. Written in plain English, not in legalese. Our briefs summarize and simplify; they don’t just repeat the court’s language.