Bamford v. Upper Republican Natural Resources District
Nebraska Supreme Court
245 Neb. 299, 512 N.W.2d 642 (1994)
- Written by Oni Harton, JD
Facts
The State Director of Water Resources (DWR) designated the areas involved in the litigation as a groundwater control area under state law. The DWR designates a location of a control area after evaluating relevant information and data. The DWR determines whether there would be an inadequate ground water supply to meet the present or reasonably foreseeable need for beneficial use of such water supply. The DWR also evaluates whether the quality of the water supply would deteriorate to the point that it would become unsuitable for the present purposes for which it is being utilized. Bamford (plaintiff) attempted to demonstrate that the supply of water was sufficient for all users. Bamford also attempted to build a case for a takings claim. The evidence did not demonstrate that Bamford was deprived of all economic use of the land. Upper Republican Natural Resources District (district) (defendant) ordered Bamford to cease withdrawing groundwater from irrigation wells. Bamford sued the district. The court rejected Bamford’s attempt to offer evidence that the supply of water was sufficient to supply all users.
Rule of Law
Issue
Holding and Reasoning (Boslaugh, J.)
What to do next…
Here's why 824,000 law students have relied on our case briefs:
- Written by law professors and practitioners, not other law students. 46,400 briefs, keyed to 989 casebooks. Top-notch customer support.
- The right amount of information, includes the facts, issues, rule of law, holding and reasoning, and any concurrences and dissents.
- Access in your classes, works on your mobile and tablet. Massive library of related video lessons and high quality multiple-choice questions.
- Easy to use, uniform format for every case brief. Written in plain English, not in legalese. Our briefs summarize and simplify; they don’t just repeat the court’s language.