Bamford v. Upper Republican Natural Resources District

245 Neb. 299, 512 N.W.2d 642 (1994)

From our private database of 46,400+ case briefs, written and edited by humans—never with AI.

Bamford v. Upper Republican Natural Resources District

Nebraska Supreme Court
245 Neb. 299, 512 N.W.2d 642 (1994)

Facts

The State Director of Water Resources (DWR) designated the areas involved in the litigation as a groundwater control area under state law. The DWR designates a location of a control area after evaluating relevant information and data. The DWR determines whether there would be an inadequate ground water supply to meet the present or reasonably foreseeable need for beneficial use of such water supply. The DWR also evaluates whether the quality of the water supply would deteriorate to the point that it would become unsuitable for the present purposes for which it is being utilized. Bamford (plaintiff) attempted to demonstrate that the supply of water was sufficient for all users. Bamford also attempted to build a case for a takings claim. The evidence did not demonstrate that Bamford was deprived of all economic use of the land. Upper Republican Natural Resources District (district) (defendant) ordered Bamford to cease withdrawing groundwater from irrigation wells. Bamford sued the district. The court rejected Bamford’s attempt to offer evidence that the supply of water was sufficient to supply all users.

Rule of Law

Issue

Holding and Reasoning (Boslaugh, J.)

What to do next…

  1. Unlock this case brief with a free (no-commitment) trial membership of Quimbee.

    You’ll be in good company: Quimbee is one of the most widely used and trusted sites for law students, serving more than 824,000 law students since 2011. Some law schools even subscribe directly to Quimbee for all their law students.

  2. Learn more about Quimbee’s unique (and proven) approach to achieving great grades at law school.

    Quimbee is a company hell-bent on one thing: helping you get an “A” in every course you take in law school, so you can graduate at the top of your class and get a high-paying law job. We’re not just a study aid for law students; we’re the study aid for law students.

Here's why 824,000 law students have relied on our case briefs:

  • Written by law professors and practitioners, not other law students. 46,400 briefs, keyed to 989 casebooks. Top-notch customer support.
  • The right amount of information, includes the facts, issues, rule of law, holding and reasoning, and any concurrences and dissents.
  • Access in your classes, works on your mobile and tablet. Massive library of related video lessons and high quality multiple-choice questions.
  • Easy to use, uniform format for every case brief. Written in plain English, not in legalese. Our briefs summarize and simplify; they don’t just repeat the court’s language.

Access this case brief for FREE

With a 7-day free trial membership
Here's why 824,000 law students have relied on our case briefs:
  • Reliable - written by law professors and practitioners, not other law students
  • The right length and amount of information - includes the facts, issue, rule of law, holding and reasoning, and any concurrences and dissents
  • Access in your class - works on your mobile and tablet
  • 46,400 briefs - keyed to 989 casebooks
  • Uniform format for every case brief
  • Written in plain English - not in legalese and not just repeating the court's language
  • Massive library of related video lessons - and practice questions
  • Top-notch customer support

Access this case brief for FREE

With a 7-day free trial membership