Banco Ambrosiano v. Artoc Bank and Trust

62 N.Y.2d 65, 476 N.Y.S.2d 64, 464 N.E.2d 432 (1984)

From our private database of 46,200+ case briefs, written and edited by humans—never with AI.

Banco Ambrosiano v. Artoc Bank and Trust

New York Court of Appeals
62 N.Y.2d 65, 476 N.Y.S.2d 64, 464 N.E.2d 432 (1984)

Facts

Banco Ambrosiano S.p.A. (Ambrosiano) (plaintiff) was an Italian international bank with a main office in Italy and an office in New York. Artoc Bank and Trust, Ltd. (Artoc) (defendant), which also engaged in international banking, was organized under Bahamas law. Neither Ambrosiano nor Artoc were authorized to conduct banking business in New York. According to Ambrosiano, it loaned Artoc $15 million, but Artoc did not repay the money. Artoc acknowledged receiving $15 million from Ambrosiano but disputed owing any repayment. All the parties’ negotiations about the $15 million occurred in Italy, the Bahamas, and Peru; no negotiations occurred in New York. Artoc maintained a bank account with New York-based Brown Brothers Harriman and Company (Brown), which Artoc regularly used for transactions involving United States dollars. The Brown account was Artoc’s sole contact with New York. Ambrosiano provided the $15 million to Artoc by depositing the money in Artoc’s Brown account; Artoc was to return the money (if return was necessary) via Ambrosiano’s account with a New York bank. Ambrosiano sued Artoc in New York state court to recover the $15 million. The supreme court granted Ambrosiano’s ex parte request to enjoin Brown from transferring the funds in Artoc’s account. The supreme court subsequently confirmed its order, ruling that although Artoc concededly was not subject to in personam jurisdiction in New York, the court had quasi-in-rem jurisdiction because Artoc’s Brown account bore a reasonable relationship to Ambrosiano’s claim. The appellate division affirmed but granted Artoc leave to appeal.

Rule of Law

Issue

Holding and Reasoning (Wachtler, J.)

What to do next…

  1. Unlock this case brief with a free (no-commitment) trial membership of Quimbee.

    You’ll be in good company: Quimbee is one of the most widely used and trusted sites for law students, serving more than 791,000 law students since 2011. Some law schools—such as Yale, Berkeley, and Northwestern—even subscribe directly to Quimbee for all their law students.

    Unlock this case briefRead our student testimonials
  2. Learn more about Quimbee’s unique (and proven) approach to achieving great grades at law school.

    Quimbee is a company hell-bent on one thing: helping you get an “A” in every course you take in law school, so you can graduate at the top of your class and get a high-paying law job. We’re not just a study aid for law students; we’re the study aid for law students.

    Learn about our approachRead more about Quimbee

Here's why 791,000 law students have relied on our case briefs:

  • Written by law professors and practitioners, not other law students. 46,200 briefs, keyed to 988 casebooks. Top-notch customer support.
  • The right amount of information, includes the facts, issues, rule of law, holding and reasoning, and any concurrences and dissents.
  • Access in your classes, works on your mobile and tablet. Massive library of related video lessons and high quality multiple-choice questions.
  • Easy to use, uniform format for every case brief. Written in plain English, not in legalese. Our briefs summarize and simplify; they don’t just repeat the court’s language.

Access this case brief for FREE

With a 7-day free trial membership
Here's why 791,000 law students have relied on our case briefs:
  • Reliable - written by law professors and practitioners, not other law students
  • The right length and amount of information - includes the facts, issue, rule of law, holding and reasoning, and any concurrences and dissents
  • Access in your class - works on your mobile and tablet
  • 46,200 briefs - keyed to 988 casebooks
  • Uniform format for every case brief
  • Written in plain English - not in legalese and not just repeating the court's language
  • Massive library of related video lessons - and practice questions
  • Top-notch customer support

Access this case brief for FREE

With a 7-day free trial membership