Logourl black
From our private database of 12,700+ case briefs...

Banco do Brasil S.A. v. State of Antigua and Barbuda

Appellate Division of New York, First Department
707 N.Y.S.2d 151 (2000)


Facts

In November 1981, Banco do Brasil S.A. (Banco) (plaintiff) made a loan to the State of Antigua and Barbuda (State) (defendant). Promissory notes and a guarantee of payment executed by the State’s Ministry of Finance (Ministry) (defendant) were entered into in conjunction with the loan agreement. The State defaulted on the loan, the final payment of which was due January 21, 1985. In a letter to Banco dated October 5, 1989, the Ministry acknowledged its obligation to pay the amount owed and asked for six months to formulate a payment schedule. In a later letter to Banco dated February 24, 1997 and signed by its financial secretary, the Ministry confirmed the existing balances on the loan, including past-due and accrued interest, as well as the total amount owed. When neither the State nor the Ministry paid off the loan in spite of Banco’s demands, Banco sued them for breach of the loan agreement, the promissory notes, and the guarantee. The State and the Ministry moved to dismiss the case on the grounds that the applicable statute of limitations—six years—had run and therefore barred the suit. The trial court denied defendants’ motion, ruling that the Ministry’s 1997 letter had revived the statute of limitations under New York General Obligations Law § 17-101. The State and the Ministry appealed.

Rule of Law

The rule of law is the black letter law upon which the court rested its decision. To access this section, start your 7-day free trial of Quimbee for Law Students.

Issue

The issue section includes the dispositive legal issue in the case phrased as a question. To access this section, start your 7-day free trial of Quimbee for Law Students.

Holding and Reasoning (Lerner, J.)

The holding and reasoning section includes:

  • A “yes” or “no” answer to the question framed in the issue section;
  • A summary of the majority or plurality opinion, using the CREAC method; and
  • The procedural disposition (e.g. reversed and remanded, affirmed, etc.).

To access this section, start your 7-day free trial of Quimbee for Law Students.

What to do next…

  1. Unlock this case brief with a free (no-commitment) trial membership of Quimbee.

    You’ll be in good company: Quimbee is one of the most widely used and trusted sites for law students, serving more than 97,000 law students since 2011. Some law schools—such as Yale, Vanderbilt, Berkeley, and the University of Illinois—even subscribe directly to Quimbee for all their law students. Read our student testimonials.

  2. Learn more about Quimbee’s unique (and proven) approach to achieving great grades at law school.

    Quimbee is a company hell-bent on one thing: helping you get an “A” in every course you take in law school, so you can graduate at the top of your class and get a high-paying law job. We’re not just a study aid for law students; we’re the study aid for law students. Read more about Quimbee.

Here's why 120,000 law students have relied on our case briefs:

  • Written by law professors and practitioners, not other law students. 12,700 briefs, keyed to 172 casebooks. Top-notch customer support.
  • The right amount of information, includes the facts, issues, rule of law, holding and reasoning, and any concurrences and dissents.
  • Access in your classes, works on your mobile and tablet. Massive library of related video lessons and high quality multiple-choice questions.
  • Easy to use, uniform format for every case brief. Written in plain English, not in legalese. Our briefs summarize and simplify; they don’t just repeat the court’s language.