From our private database of 22,300+ case briefs...
Banco Nacional De Cuba v. Sabbatino
United States Supreme Court
376 U.S. 398, 84 S.Ct. 923, 11 L.Ed.2d 804 (1964)
The United States imposed a reduction on its import quota for Cuban sugar. In retaliation, Cuba nationalized many companies in which U.S. nationals had interests. One such company was CAV, a sugar company in which Whitlock Farr (defendant), an American commodities broker, had an interest. Farr had contracted to buy a shipload of CAV sugar. After Cuba nationalized the company, Farr entered into a new agreement to buy the sugar from the Cuban Government. However, CAV promised to indemnify Farr for any losses suffered provided he would turn the sugar sales proceeds over to CAV instead of the Cuban government. Cuba assigned the bills of lading to its shipping agent, Banco Nacional (plaintiff), and Farr passed along the sugar and collected payments from his customers. Relying on the promise of indemnification from CAV, Farr passed along the proceeds to CAV instead of Cuba. Banco Nacional sued Farr for conversion of the bills of lading. It also sought to enjoin Sabbatino (defendant), the temporary receiver of CAV’s New York assets, from distributing the received proceeds. Farr defended on the ground that title to the sugar never passed to Cuba because the expropriation of CAV’s proceeds by Cuba violated international law. The district court granted summary judgment for Farr and Sabbatino as it found that the American act of state doctrine did not apply to a violation of international law by a foreign actor, and that Cuba’s expropriation violated international law. The appellate court affirmed, and the United States Supreme Court granted certiorari.
Rule of Law
Holding and Reasoning (Harlan, J.)
Dissent (White, J.)
What to do next…
Unlock this case brief with a free (no-commitment) trial membership of Quimbee.
You’ll be in good company: Quimbee is one of the most widely used and trusted sites for law students, serving more than 516,000 law students since 2011. Some law schools—such as Yale, Berkeley, and Northwestern—even subscribe directly to Quimbee for all their law students.Unlock this case briefRead our student testimonials
Learn more about Quimbee’s unique (and proven) approach to achieving great grades at law school.
Quimbee is a company hell-bent on one thing: helping you get an “A” in every course you take in law school, so you can graduate at the top of your class and get a high-paying law job. We’re not just a study aid for law students; we’re the study aid for law students.Learn about our approachRead more about Quimbee
Here's why 516,000 law students have relied on our case briefs:
- Written by law professors and practitioners, not other law students. 22,300 briefs, keyed to 984 casebooks. Top-notch customer support.
- The right amount of information, includes the facts, issues, rule of law, holding and reasoning, and any concurrences and dissents.
- Access in your classes, works on your mobile and tablet. Massive library of related video lessons and high quality multiple-choice questions.
- Easy to use, uniform format for every case brief. Written in plain English, not in legalese. Our briefs summarize and simplify; they don’t just repeat the court’s language.